Hazrat Umme Kulthum ki Umar se Shaadi ek Afsana Hai- Confession by a Sunni Scholar -Urdu Video

Note : Hum yaha par ye Sunni Aalim ke har baat se muttafiq nahi hai. !! Hame toh bas ye batana hai ke In Aalim ka bhi maanna hai ke Umar ki Shaadi Hazrat Umme Kulthum se nahi Hui thi.

 Ab Jabke ye Saabit ho gaya hai ke Aisi Koi Shaadi Nahi Hui, to phir doosre Sunni Aalimo ko bhi is baat ko maan lena chahiye aur kam se kam ye maanna chahiye ke is Shaadi se Umar ki Izzat afzai nahi hoti hai balke Tauheen hoti hai jaysa ke Ye Sunni Aalim ka maanna hai!!

Hazrat Umme Kulsum ka Umar se Nikah ghair-e-shia ka Jahilana Jhoot

Ye sirf ek jhooot hai ki Maula Ali a.s masoom  wali-e-khuda wasi-e-rasol s.a.w alamdar-e-parchame-e-islam ,sher-e-khuda, la fatah illa ali a.s ne jiske shaan mai zulfiqaar utri usne apni phool si kam umr masooma bachi ka nikah usse kar diya ki 

jo ohad aur  hunain rasool s.a.w ki jaan ko musibat mai cchod apni jaan bachakar bhaage,,,,

umar ka bhagne ki ye baat sahih bukhari mai darj hain

is baat ko aqalmand reject karenge

Jaise inhone kiya 

Nikah-e-Umm Kulthum (RA) 2/3 Mufakkir-e-Islam Pir Syed Abdul Qadir Jilani

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejXv7z9so8Y&feature=related

is video mai pir syed abdul qadir jilani umme kulsum ke nikah ko reject kar diya hai ,,toh baaqi log kyu aitbaar karte hain

ISKO MANNA HAI WOH MAAN LENGE YAHI DALEEL KAAFI HAI

==============================================================

ab ye jhooot kahan se shuru hota hai ye bhi bata deta hoon

YE ISLIYE SHURU HOTA KI JAB HUM LOG UMAR KA ZULM BIBI SYEDA PER DIKHATE HAIN 

TOH UMME KULSUM KE NIKAH KA ZIKR SIRF ISLIYE HOTA HAI TAAKI  Umar PER YE ILZAM HAT JAYE

MAGAR YE BAS EK CROSS QUESTION ,,,,KHUD DEKHIYE KI INLOGON APNI  FAMOUS HAQ CHAR YAR SITE PER IN LOGON NE TOPIC KO CHANGE KAR DIYA ,,

JAB KI MUJHE UMME KULSUM KA MATTER WAHAN PER DISCUSS KARNA KI JAGAHN PER HUMNE BIBI SYEDA KE UPER UMAR KE ZULM HAWAVA DIYA PEHLE USKO CLEAR KIYA JAYE KI RIVAYATEN JHOOTI HAI YA SACHI?

TOH PEHLE YE BATAYE KI BIBI SYEDA PER DAR GIRANE WAALE SE MAULA ALI A.S APNI BETI KI SHAADI KARA DENGE?

TOH PEHLE IS MASLE KO CLEAR KARE PHIR BAAD MAI SHADI KA MASLA

==============================================================

ab tasdeeq shia books ki aur shia aulaamao ki,,,

jaise ki humne dekha hai ki ye sirf ek cross question ek mauzo se hat kar jaan bachana ke liye ...

aur gher-e-shia ke samajhdar log isse reject karte hain 

Toh ab dekhen ki shia hazrat ki books mai kaun si rivayaten jinse ye fayda lena chahte hain

FURU KAFI MAI RIVAYAT HAI KI JAB UMAR MAR GAYA TOH MAULA ALI AS  UMME KULSUM KO GHAR WAPIS LE AYE

IT MEANS FOR GHER-E-SHIA KI SHAADI HUI THIH MAGAR TASDEEQ KE HISAB YE RIVAYAT BIBI UMME KULSUM BINT ALI A.S SE SHADI UMAR KI HUI NAHI MAANI JA SAKTI HAI,,DOSRI BAAT YE HAI KI KOI BHI BAAT SHIA MASLAK MAI JO BOOK MAI HAI JAB TAK TASDEEQ NAHI HO JAATI MANI NAI JAATI HAI ISLIYE ISKI TASDEEQ ZARURI HAIN

MAGAR AGAR SHADI HUI HOTI TOH JINSE JINSE BIBI UMMME KULSUM KI SHADI HUI HAI UNKE NAAMO MAI UMAR KA BHI NAAM SHAMIL HONA  CHAIYE ,,,,,,YA PHIR  KOI EVENT MAUJOOD HOTA KI KAB SHADI HUI 

KISNE NIKAH PADHA

LIFE KAISI GUZRI,,

UNKI ZINDAGI KA KOI WAQIYA....

AUR HUM  YE MAAN NAHI SAKTE HAIN KYUKI MAULA ALI AS EK BHAGODE SE SHAADI KARA DETE JO RASOOL.SA.W KI ZINDAGI KE MUSIBAT KE WAQT CCHOD KAR BHAG GAYE THAH?

KYA WOH AADMI AITBAAR KE LAYAKH HAI KI JISNE RASOOL S.A.W KO HI MUSIBAT MAI CCHOD DIYA

AUR SHAADI KE YE BAAT SIHAH SATTA MAI TOH NAZAR NAHI AATI HAI .........

DOSRI RIVAYAT MAI HAI KI JAB BIBI UMME KULSUM AUR UNKA BETA ZAID EK HI DIN INTEQAAL KAR GAYE 

UNKI NAMAZ-E-JANAZA IMAM HASAN A.S NE PADHAI...

IT MEANS KE YE KARBALA SE PEHLE KA WAQIYA HAI ,,,AUR BIBI UMME KULSUM TOH KARBALA MAI MAIJOOD THI

YE SAB JAANTE HAIN...

AB TASDEEQ KE HISAB SE DEKHA JAYE TOH ZAID IBNE UMAR UMME KULSUM KA BETA KAHA JATA HAI TOH PEHLE YE BAAT CLEAR KAR DUN KI UMME KULSUM KI KOI AULAAD NAHI THIH

TOH YE UMME KULSUM DOSRI HAIN

AUR ALI A.S KI BETI UMME KULSUM NAHI HAIN,

KYUKI UMME KULSUM JISKA BETA ZAID THAH WOH KARBALA SE PEHLE CHAL BASI..

JAB KI ASL BETI KARBALA MAI THIH..

2 DALEELEN AAPKE SAAMNE RAKHDI GAYI HAIN....JINKO KOI BHI AQAL MAND MAN LEGA

=============================================================

MAI YE ACCCHI TARHAN SE JAANTA HOON KI YE VIDEO DIKHANE KE BAAD, YE SUBOOT DENE KE BAAD BHI LOG YE KAHENGE KI SCHOLAR BEWAQOOF HAI AUR BIKA HUA HAI VDO FARZI HAI AUR ISI JAHIYAT PER ADE REHNA CHAHENGE KI .......TOH PHIR ADE RAHEN HAI ISI JAHIYAT PER AUR KEHTE RAHE HAIN GHER MAREFAT BATEN...

KHAIR MERA KAAM HAI JAWAB DENA MAI DE RAHA HOON LAKUM DENAKUM WALA YADIN

===============================================================

AGAR YE DEKHA JAYE KI BIBI UMME KULSUM KI SHAADI UMAR SE HUI

TOH DEKHIYE ZARA KIS TARAHN SE HUI

Let us begin with Asad al Ghaybah Volume 5 page 367:

"Abu Umar narrates on the authority of Zubayr Bakri, 'Umar asked for the hand of Ali's daughter, who replied that she was too young. 'Umar asked twice more. 'Ali said 'I shall send the girl to you, if you like her than say 'I accept''. 'Ali then sent the girl with a cloth and told her to say [to 'Umar] 'This is the scarf that I was talking about'. She conveyed these words to 'Umar, who said 'Tell your father that I accept'. Umar then touched the girl's calf. She exclaimed 'You have done this to me? If it hadn't been for the fact that you are Khalifa of the Muslims I would have broken your nose'. The girl went home and repeated the episode to her father, stating 'You sent me to a foul man', with that 'Ali said 'He is your husband'."

http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/umme_kulthum/asadul_ghaiba.jpg

lo ji abhi shaadi hui nahi aur ek namehram ladki ko ccheda toh ladki ne kya kaha ki mai tere ko jhapad hi maar dungi..

then apne baap se jakar kaha ki woh admi sahih nahi thah accha nahi thah""'You sent me to a foul man'"" 

JAB LADKI AKAR YE COMPLAIN KAR RAHI HAI AUR IS TARAHN KA WAQIYA BAYAN KIYA HAI TOH KAUN SA BAAP  JISNE JO AISE SHAKHS SE SHAADI KARAYEGA?

another proof

Al Isaba Volume 4 page 492 reports the text similarly with difference being the comment of Umme Kalthum (as) namely:

"If it hadn't been the fact that you were Khalifa of the Muslims I would have spat in your face".

http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/umme_kulthum/al_isaba_p492.jpg

YE BAAT SAMAJH NAHI AAATI HAI KI AAP LOG AISI SHAAN KAISE MAAN LETE HAIN KI LADKI KISI MARD KO USKE BEHAVIOUR PER KAHE KI

i would have spat in your face

what does it mean? tazeem?

ISKA MATLAB YE HAI KI HAZRAT UMAR KE CHARACTER MAI KUCH NA KUCH KHARABI THI TAB HI EK LADKI NE AISA KAHA KI """MUH TOD DUNGI"""AANKHE NIKAL LUNGI..

koi toh samjhao ki umar ki yahi izzat hai ki ladki ko ghar per bulakar check kar rahe the aur kuch namunasib baat ki toh ladki ne kaha teri naak tod dungi..........tera muh phoood dungi?

YAHI IZZAT HAI KI LADKI KAHE TERA MUH PHOOD DUNGI,,,

,AUR GHAR PER AKAR YE BEHOODA HARKAR APNE BAAP KO BATAYE  AUR KAHE KI WOH AADMI BOHOT KHARAB THAH ACCHA NAHI THAH TOH WOH BAAP BETI KI NAHI SUNEGA AUR KAHEGA WOH TUMHARA SHOHAR HAI??

MUJHE LAGTA HAI KI IS BAAT PER YAQEEN KARNE WAALE APNI BETIYO KO BHI AISE HI NAMEHRAMO KE GHAR CHECK KARWAANE BHEJTE HAIN KI SHADI KE LAYAKH HO GAYI YA NAHI?

EK MINT KE FARZ KIYA JAYE KI MAAZ ALLAH HAZRAT ALI RAZI ALLAH TAHLA HO ANHO NE APNI BETI KO EK AISE AADMI KE PASS BHEJA KI JO USKA NAMEHRAM ??

KYA AAP YE GAVARA KARENGE KI AAP APNI BETIYO KO SHAADI SE PEHLE EK NAMEHRAM MARD KE PASS USE PASAND KARWANE BHEJEN??

JAB AAP APNI LADKI KO NAHI BHEJENGE TOH ALI A.S KE LIYE KAISE YE BAAT PER AITBAAR KARTE HAIN?

waah ji aqal ke godhe nahi toh gadhe hi dauda lo :P,

,tumhare aqal ke gadhe nahi daudenge mai mujhe hi kooda chalane padenge ;) :P 

KOODE GINO 

KODA NO 1= ALI A.S KI BETI KI SHAADI USE  HUI KI  JO JUNGO SE RASOOL S.A.W KO HI CCHOD KAR BHAAG KADHA HUA THAH

KODA NO 2= ALI A.S KI BETI  KARBALA KE BAAD SHAHADAT KAR GAYI,,JAB KI ZAID IBNE UMAR KI MAA UMME KULSUM KARBALA SE PEHLE HI WAFAAT KAR GAYI THIH...AUR ASLI UMME KULSUM KARBALA MAI MAJOOOD THIH

KODA NO 3=AL A.S SALAM NE MAAZ ALLAH APNI BETI EK NAMEHRAM KO BHEJ DI KE USE CHECK KARE ASTARFIRULLAH

KODA NO 4= US LADKI  NE UMAR KO KAHA HAI TERA MUH TOD DUNGI TERI NAAK TOD DUNGI

KODA NO 5=  IMAM ALI A.S NE YE SAARI UMAR KI BATTAMIZIYA SUNI AUR APNI BETI SE KI ""AAPNE MUJHE EK BEIMAAN KE PASS BHEJ DIYA,,,TOH LADKI KI NAMANZOORI AUR ITNI BATTAMIZI PER BHI ALI A.S NE SHADI KARA DI

YE PAANCH KODE MAARE HAIN MAGAR TUM LOGO TOH BESHARAM HO KHUD SOCHO APNI BETI KO KISI KE GHAR CHECK KARWANE BHEJOGE    KI  """LO BHAIYAA  CHECK KAR LO TUMHE PASAND AAYE TOH SHADI KAR LENA,,AUR WOH SHAKH USE GALE LAGAYE KISS KARE.......IS BAAT KO AHLESUNNAT KE QABIL LOG SAMJHE AUR SOCHE KI JAB AAP APNI BETI KO KISI NAMEHRAM KE YAHAN NAI BHEJENGE TOH ALI A.S AMEER UL MOMINEEN HOKAR KAISE BHEJ SAKTE HAIN?

ye baat toh sabit ho gayi ke ahle sunnat aur wahabi  jahil hain aur ko anti shia sites per hamare baare mai ghalat aur gumrah kar rahe hain un jahilo se meri koi behas nahi hai...

============================================================

KUCH AUR SAWAL  AHLE SUNNAT SE UMME KULSUM KE NIKAH KE BARE MAI

KYA NANA KI  NAVASI SE SHADI JAYEZ HAIN?

TAREEKH MAI KI RASOOL S.AW NE MUH BOLEY BETE KI BETI SE SHADI KI THI...MAGAR WOH MUH BOLA BETA THA NA KI RISHAT USKA THHA

JAISE KI SAB JANTE HAIN KI UMAR KA RISHTA HAFSA KE SAUTELE MA BANNE BIBI FATIMA KI UMME KULSUM S.A SE SAUTELE PAR NANA KA RISHTA BAN JAATA HAI..AGAR YE KAHA JAYE KI  MUH BOLI BETE KI BETI SE SHADI KI THI TOH

KYA HAFSA MUH BOLI BIWI THIH?

KYA UMAR MUH BOLEY SASUR JI THE?

AUR YE BHI KAHA JAATA HAI BOHOT DOOR KA RISHTA THA,,,KYA UMAR AUR HAFSA RASOOL S.A.W KI BETI KI BETI SE BOHOT DOOR KA RISHTA THA?MATLAB KUCH AHLE SUNNAT AUR WAHABI ANSWER KUCH S TARAHN SE DETE HAIN...

= BOHOT DOOR AUR MUH BOLI BIWI HAFSA AUR BOHOT DOOR KE MUH BOLEY SASUR JI SE SHADI 

EK AUR SAWAL HAI MERA KI KYA QAMR-E-BANI HASHIM MAI SHUJA AUR NAUJAWAN KHOOBSURAT  MARDO KI KAMI PAD GAYI THIH JO UMAR JO UNKI MAA SE AGE MAI BADE THEE AUR APNI NAVASI SHAADI KARAI GAYI??

TOH EK BAAT SAMJHAI JAYE KI..

TUMHARI KOI SAUTELI NAVASI (JAISE BIBI FATIMA ZEHRA UMAR KI THIH)

THEN US NAVASI KI SHAADI HO JAYE

AUR USKE BACHE HO TOH  KYA TUMHARI GHERAT GAVARA KAREGI KI JISKI MAA NAVASI KA RISHTA RAKHITI THIH USKI BETI SE SHAADI KAR LOGEY?

KHUD SOCHO KI KYA TUMHARI GHERAT GAVARA KAREGI KI APNI NAVASI SE SHAADI KAR LO?

KYA HAZRAT UMAR KO GHERAT NAHI AAYI?

AB YE MAT KEHNA KI ARAB MAI US WAQT HO JAAYA KARTI THIH,,,ISLAM ARABI LAWS SE NAHI CHALTA AUR US WAQT DEEN KE AHKAMAAT MUKKAMMAL THEH AUR HAIN TOH TAB BHI SHADI KARADI NAVASI SE?

ARAB MAI HO JAATI US WAQT..WHAT A STUPID ANSWER IS THIS lolzz

ARAB MAI TOH APNI BETI BAHU MA PHUPPI SE LOG SHADI KAR LETE THEH TOH KYA WOH SAHI THHA?

IS BEGHAIRAT BAAT MAI AAP APNE DOSRE KHALIFA KO TOH UCCHAL HI RAHE HAIN,,,

MAGAR ISLAMIC LAWS KE KHILAAF JAKAR ULTI SEEDHI BATEN BHI PHAILA RAHE HAIN AUR 

ISMAI TOH AP ALI A.S KO HI BADNAAM KAR RAHE HAIN KI UNHONE SHARIYATON KE KHILAAF JAKAR RASOOL S.A.W KE SASUR APNI BETI KI SHAADI KARA DI.......

DEKHA JAYE TOH YE BHI KAHA JAYEGA KI 

JI NAHI AISA KUCH NAHI HUA THHA 

KI UMAR NE GALE LAGAYA BOSE DIYE...

MAI POCHTA HOON KI AAP LOG KEHTE HAIN NA KI ALI A.S APNI LADKI BHEJI UMAR KO JI WOH PASAND KARTE HAIN YA NAHI?

KYA ALI A.S AISA KARTE?? KI LO BETI PASAND AAYE TOH SHAADI KAR LEN AUR AKELE MAI USKE SAATH BHEJ DEN KI JO ABHI NAMEHRAM HAIN?

KHAIR MAI AAPSE POCHNA CHAHTA HOON KUCH SAWAL

KYA TUM APNI NAVASI SE SHAADI KAR LOGEY?

KYA TUM APNI BETI KO KISI NAMEHRAM KO AKELE MAI BHEJOGE KI YE LO CHECK KAR LO PASAND AAYE TOH SHADI KAR LENA ?

KYA TUMHARI GHAIRAT GAVARA KARTI HAI KI USKO APNI BETI DE DO JO TUMHARE BHAI KO HI MUSIBAT MAI CCCHOD BHAAG JAATA THHA?

Why Shias curse Umar ?? Is it right to curse the Companion of Prophet(sawa)??

A lot of times Shias are accused of Cursing Umar and Abu Bakr……….So let us see how Holy Prophet (asws) cursed those who would Harm His Pure Progeny, and stop respecting them.

We find a narration in Mustadrak Imam Hakim, with talkhees of Dhabi, 102 – حدثنا أبو محمد عبد الله بن جعفر بن درستويه الفارسي ثنا يعقوب بن سفيان الفارسي
و حدثنا أبو بكر بن إسحاق الفقيه ثنا الحسن بن علي بن زياد قالا : ثنا إسحاق بن محمد الفروي ثنا عبد الرحمن بن أبي الموال القرشي
و أخبرني محمد بن المؤمل ثنا الفضل بن محمد الشعراني ثنا قتيبة بن سعد ثنا عمرو بن حزم عن عمرة عن عائشة قالت : قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : ستة لعنتهم لعنهم الله و كل بني مجاب المكذب بقدر الله و الزائد في كتاب الله و المتسلط بالجبروت يذل من أعز الله و يعز من أذل الله و المستحل لحرم الله و المستحل من عترتي ما حرم الله و التارك لسنتي
قد احتج البخاري بعبد الرحمن بن أبي الموال و هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد و لا أعرف له علة و لم يخرجاه
تعليق الذهبي قي التلخيص : صحيح ولا أعرف له عل
Holy Prophet (asws) said: 6 groups of people are those who are Cursed by Me, and by Allah, and Prayer of every Prophet is accepted: (1) Who denies destiny of Allah (2) who introduces extra part in Allah (3) who tries to control the power in that he insults one who is given Respect by Allah, and respects the one disgraced by Allah (4) Who allows Haram of Allah {from what Allah prohibited} (5) who allows for my Progeny what is prohibited by Allah (6) who leaves my Sunnah {Hakim says} Bukhari has argued with Abdul rehman, and This Hadeeth is Sahih in chain.
 Dhabi says: Sahih. [1]  
Apart from Hakim and Dhabi, other Scholars who have accepted its authenticity, includes 1- Ibn Hajar Haithmi [2] 2- Hafiz Noor ud Deen Haithmi [3] 3- Ibn Hibban, as mentioned by Haithmi in Majma uz Zawaid 4- Ibn Abi Asim [4]
Having mentioned the authenticity, Let us now pay attention to the words of Prophet (asws) و المستحل من عترتي ما حرم الله Let us see what Scholars of Ahlu Sunnah said in explanation of this part. Ubaid ulllah al Mubarakfuri writes ‘ (والمستحل من عترتي ما حرم الله) أي من إيذائهم وترك تعظيمهم
(And they would allow for my Progeny what is Prohibited by Allah), this means giving Harm to them and disrespecting them. [5] ‘ Mulla Ali Qari writes in explanation ‘ قوله : والمستحل من عترتي ما حرم الله ) أي : من إيذائهم ، وترك تعظيمهم ، والعترة : الأقارب القريبة ، وهم أولاد فاطمة وذراريهم ، وتخصيص ذكر الحرم والعترة وكل مستحل محرم ملعون لشرفهما ، وإن أحدهما منسوب إلى الله ، والآخر إلى رسول الله ‘ And the saying: (who allows for my Progeny what has been prohibited by Allah). It is: teasing them and not respecting them. And al Etra, it means the near relatives, and they are the Children of Fatima (asws) and their Progeny. [6]

And this explanation takes us to our subject ===> Curse of Allah and His Prophet (asws) is on Those who Harm His Progeny and Quit respecting them.

It is a well known fact found even in many Sunni Books that Hazrat Fatima- the beloved daughter of Holy Prophet(sawa) was disrespected by Umar and Abu Bakr in presence of many Sahabas and She was denied her right of FADAK. After few days , Hazrat Fatima was killed by Umar when he set the door of Hazrat Fatima on fire and pushed the burning door on her.She died due to the injury inflicted by Umar.

O! lovers of Holy Prophet(sawa) , join Holy Prophet(sawa) and  your Shia brothers  in Cursing Umar- the person responsible for harming the pure progeny of Prophet(sawa) 

SUNNI REFERENCES:- ‘
1- Mustadrak Imam Hakim With Talkhees of Dhabi, 1/46. It has also been mentioned by Tirmidhi in his Sunan, 4/457, Hadeeth. 2154  
2- Sawaiq ul Moharriqa,Ibn Hajar Haithmi, 2/506, Printed by Musasa tur Risala, Lebanon, 1417. His exact words are:- وَصَحَّ أَيْضا أَنه صلى الله عَلَيْهِ وَسلم قَالَ (سِتَّة لعنتهم ولعنهم الله وكل نَبِي مجاب الزَّائِد فِي كتاب الله  
3- Majma uz Zawaid,Hafiz Haithmi, 7/205, Hadeeth. 11876, Printed by Maktaba tul Qudsi, Cairo. His words are 11876 - وَعَنْ عَائِشَةَ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ – صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ – قَالَ: «سِتَّةٌ لَعَنْتُهُمْ وَكُلُّ نَبِيٍّ مُجَابٌ: الزَّائِدُ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ، وَالْمُكَذِّبُ بِقَدَرِ اللَّهِ، وَالْمُسْتَحِلُّ لِمَحَارِمِ اللَّهِ، وَالْمُسْتَحِلُّ مِنْ عِتْرَتِي مَا حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ، وَتَارِكُ السُّنَّةِ».
رَوَاهُ الطَّبَرَانِيُّ فِي الْأَوْسَطِ، وَرِجَالُهُ ثِقَاتٌ، وَقَدْ صَحَّحَهُ ابْنُ حِبَّانَ.
4- Kitab us Sunnah,Ibn Abi Asim, 1/24, Hadeeth. 44, Printed by Maktab Islami, 1400. His words are إسناده حسن لولا انه أعل بالإرسال كما يأتي رجاله ثقات رجال البخاري غير ابن موهب واسمه عبيد الله بن عبد الرحمن بن عبد الله بن موهب وهو مختلف فيه ولعل الأرجح أنه حسن الحديث كما هو قول ابن عدي
5- Mira’at ul Mafateeh Sharah Mishkat ul Masabeeh,Mubarakfuri, 1/198. 6- Mirqaat ul Mafateeh Sharah Miskhkat ul Masabeeh, Mulla Ali Qari, 1/184, Printed by Dar ul Fikr, lebanon. 1422.

Tehreef in Hadeeth about Muta’a in Sahih Bukhari?

In order of protect Umar , the supporters of Umar have started distorting the traditions of Sahih Bukhari !!!

Let us see a narration from Sahih Bukhari first, and then see What Tehreef has been done to that.  

We find in Sahih Bukhari [1]

4339 حدثنا عمرو بن عون حدثنا خالد عن إسماعيل عن قيس عن عبد الله رضي الله عنه قال كنا نغزو مع النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وليس معنا نساء فقلنا ألا نختصي فنهانا عن ذلك فرخص لنا بعد ذلك أن نتزوج المرأة بالثوب ثم قرأ يا أيها الذين آمنوا لا تحرموا طيبات ما أحل الله لكم Let us see the online translation for this narration [2] ‘ Volume 6, Book 60, Number 139 :
Narrated by Abdullah
We used to participate in the holy wars carried on by the Prophet and we had no women (wives) with us. So we said (to the Prophet ). “Shall we castrate ourselves?” But the Prophet forbade us to do that and thenceforth he allowed us to marry a woman (temporarily) by giving her even a garment, and then he recited: “O you who believe! Do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you.” ‘ Here One can see that the translators have added TEMPORARILY to the translation. And it is not there in Arabic text. But the fact is that many Scholars of AhluSunnah accepted that it was there in the original narration, like has been mentioned by Muslim in his Sahih [3] ‘ 11 - (1404) حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ نُمَيْرٍ الْهَمْدَانِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي، وَوَكِيعٌ، وَابْنُ بِشْرٍ، عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، عَنْ قَيْسٍ، قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ عَبْدَ اللهِ، يَقُولُ: ” كُنَّا نَغْزُو مَعَ رَسُولِ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، لَيْسَ لَنَا نِسَاءٌ، فَقُلْنَا: أَلَا نَسْتَخْصِي؟ فَنَهَانَا عَنْ ذَلِكَ، ثُمَّ رَخَّصَ لَنَا أَنْ نَنْكِحَ الْمَرْأَةَ بِالثَّوْبِ إِلَى أَجَلٍ “، ثُمَّ قَرَأَ عَبْدُ اللهِ: {يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَا تُحَرِّمُوا طَيِّبَاتِ مَا أَحَلَّ اللهُ لَكُمْ وَلَا تَعْتَدُوا إِنَّ اللهَ لَا يُحِبُّ الْمُعْتَدِينَ} [المائدة: 87]، ‘ So Here we do see the words For Specific time ‘ Muslim is not unique in accepting these words in narration, there are other Scholars as well. Like we find ‘

1. Behqi in his Sunan [4]
2. Ibn Kathir mentioning it, & Researchers of Tafsir Ibn Kathir accepting it [5]
3. Ibn Qayyam Jauzi mentioned it [6]
4. Humaidi mentioned it [7]
5. Abdullah bin Yousaf al Zaili [8]
6. Jalal ud Deen al Sayooti [9]
7. Ibn Hajar [10]
8. Zarkashi [11]
9. Ibn Muflah al Hanbali [12]
10. Mohammad bin Ali al Shokani [13]

‘
One may say that this does not proof that it was tempered by Bukhari, and this is not what We are saying either. But what it does prove is that narration has parts missing, which have been mentioned by These Scholars, who accepted that the words were there in the narration; but which We do not find in Sahih Bukhari, though online translators for English version added those.
‘
Keep in mind that the verse recited by Abdullah bin Masood was from Surat ul Maidah, and it was the one of the last Surahs revealed.
‘
Ibn Kathir mentioned in his Tafsir, which was authenticated by Sheikh Ahmad Shakir in his Umda tu Tafaseer min Hafiz ibn Kathir (1/619), that Tirmidhi narrated that Abdullah bin Umar said that Last Surahs revealed were Surat-ul-Fath and Surat-ul-Maidah. Tirmidhi termed it Hasan Ghareeb .
‘
Also, We find another authentic narration which says that Ayesha said that Surat ul Maidah is the last Surah, what is Halal in this is Halal, and what is Haram in this is Haram [14]
‘
Ibn Masood recited Verse of This Surah, which means that the incident took place after revelation of this Surah………
‘
Yet, We see that Scholars of Ahlu Sunnah would try to deceive their followers so Easily. Like We none other than Ibn Kathir who mentioned that Surat ul Maidah was revealed as one of the last Surah; He says in tafsir of Verse of Muta’a (4/24) that
‘
وقد استدل بعموم هذه الآية على نكاح المتعة، ولا شك أنه كان مشروعاً في ابتداء الإسلام، ثم نسخ بعد ذلك
‘
And it is argued in general with this verse on Nikah-e-Muta’a, and there is no doubt that it was allowed in START of ISLAM, then it was cancelled. [15]
‘
Start of Islam???
Really???
We saw Ibn Masood reciting verse of Last Surah in the narration We mentioned……….
And What must not be forgotten is that even the Verse of Muta’a was revealed after battle of Oatas as per authentic narrations [16]
‘

Tempered narrations, misinterpretations, deceptions……………That is all about Scholars of Ahlu Sunnah……………..


‘
This article has been deduced from the work of Vali Asr’s Article in Persian. Scans of many of the references mentioned can also be seen on their link.
‘
******************************************
‘
REFERENCES
‘
[1] I have copy pasted this from the online version of Fath-ul-Bari present on islamweb.net, and this book can be seen on this link. But apart from this, the narration can be seen in different version of Sahih Bukhari, like

1. Sahih Bukhari, printed by Dar ul Afkaar ad Dolia, Hadeeth. 4615
2. Sahih Bukhari, 5/189, printed by Dar ul Fikr, 1401
3. Sahih Bukhari, p. 1135, Hadeeth. 4615, printed by Dar Ibn Kathir, Beirut, 1423
4. Sahih Bukhari, p. 633, Hadeeth. 4615, Printed by Maktaba tur Rushd, 2nd Ed., 1427

[2] Here is the link
[3] Sahih Muslim, 2/1022, Hadeeth. 1404
[4] Sunan Behqi, 7/200, Hadeeth. 13919; and he said
‘
ثنا إسماعيل عن قيس عن عبد الله بن مسعود رضي الله عنه قال كنا نغزو مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وليس معنا نساء فقلنا ألا نختصي فنهانا رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم عن ذلك ورخص لنا أن ننكح المرأة بالثوب إلى أجل لفظ حديث أبي عثمان وفي حديث أبي عبد الله ثم رخص لنا في أن نتزوج المرأة بالثوب إلى أجل ثم قرأ عبد الله يا أيها الذين آمنوا لا تحرموا طيبات ما أحل الله لكم الآية أخرجه البخاري ومسلم في الصحيح.
‘
[5] Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 3/170, Researcher Sami bin Mohammad Salama, printed by Dar Tayyaba, 2nd Ed. We find
‘
وَقَالَ سُفْيَانُ الثَّوْرِيُّ ووَكِيع، عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ أَبِي خَالِدٍ، عَنْ قَيْس بْنِ أَبِي حَازِمٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ مَسْعُودٍ قَالَ: كُنَّا نَغْزُو مَعَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، وَلَيْسَ مَعَنَا نِسَاءٌ، فَقُلْنَا: أَلَّا نَسْتَخْصِي؟ فَنَهَانَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ ذَلِكَ، وَرَخَّصَ لَنَا أَنْ نَنْكِحَ الْمَرْأَةَ بِالثَّوْبِ إِلَى أَجَلٍ، ثُمَّ قَرَأَ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ: {يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَا تُحَرِّمُوا طَيِّبَاتِ مَا أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ لَكُمْ [وَلا تَعْتَدُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ الْمُعْتَدِينَ] } (2) .
أَخْرَجَاهُ مِنْ حَدِيثِ إِسْمَاعِيلَ (3) . وَهَذَا كَانَ قَبْلَ تَحْرِيمِ نِكَاحِ الْمُتْعَةِ، وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ.
‘
And in the footnote 3, we find Sami bin Mohammad writing
(3) صحيح البخاري برقم (4615) وصحيح مسلم برقم (1404) .
‘
[6] Zaad ul Ma’ad, Ibn Qayyam, 5/111; and He writes
‘
وظاهر كلام ابن مسعود إباحتها فإن في الصحيحين عنه كنا نغزو مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وليس معنا نساء فقلنا يا رسول الله ألا نستخصي فنهانا عن ذلك ثم رخص لنا بعد أن ننكح المرأة بالثوب إلى أجل ثم قرأ عبدالله ( يا أيها الذين آمنوا لا تحرموا طيبات ما أحل الله لكم ولا تعتدوا إن الله لا يحب المعتدين) .
‘
[7] al Jama bin as Sahiheen, 1/222, Hadeeth. 257, printed by Dar ibn Hazm.
‘
[8] Nasb ur Raya le Ahadeeth ul Hidaya, 3/180; and He said
‘
وقد كانت المتعة مباحة مشروعة في صدر الإسلام وإنما أباحها النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم للسبب الذي ذكره إبن مسعود كماأخرجه البخاري ومسلم عن قيس بن أبي حازم قال سمعت عبد الله بن مسعود يقول كنا نغزو مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ليس لنا نساء فقلنا ألا نستخصي فنهانا عن ذلك ثم رخص لنا أن ننكح المرأة بالثوب إلى أجل ثم قرأ عبد الله يا أيها الذين آمنوا لا تحرموا طيبات ما أحل الله لكم ولا تعتدوا إن الله لا يحب المعتدين انتهى .
‘
[9] Tafsir Dur-e-Manthur, under tafsir of verse 87 of Surat ul Maidah , He said
‘
وأخرج البخاري ومسلم وابن أبي شيبة والنسائي وابن أبي حاتم وابن حبان والبيهقي في سننه وأبو الشيخ وابن مردويهعن ابن مسعود قال كنا نغزو مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وليس معنا نساء فقلنا ألا نستخصي فنهانا رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم عن ذلك ورخص لنا أن ننكح المرأة بالثوب إلى أجل ثم قرأ عبد الله ) يا أيها الذين آمنوا لا تحرموا طيبات ما أحل الله لكم ولا تعتدوا إن الله لا يحب المعتدين
‘
[10] al A’jab fi Bayan al Asbaab, 2/858, Printed by Dar bin Jauzi, al Saudia. He writes
‘
ويؤيده ما أخرجه الشيخان في الصحيحين عن ابن مسعود كنا نغزو وليس لنا نساء فرخص لنا أن ننكح المرأة بالثوب إلى أجل الحديث .
‘
[11] Sharah Zarkashi, 5/226-227; and He said
‘
2562 وعن ابن مسعود رضي الله عنه قال : كنا نغزو مع النبي ليس معنا نساء ، فقلنا : ألا نستخصي ؟ فنهانا عن ذلك ثم رخص لنا بعد أن ننكح المرأة بالثوب إلى أجل ، ثم قرأ عبد الله : «يا أيها الذين آمنوا لا تحرموا طيبات ما أحل الله لكم» الآية ،متفق عليه .
‘
[12] al Mubda, 6/154; and He said
‘
وعن ابن مسعود قال كنا نغزو مع النبي (ص) ليس معنا نساء فقلنا ألا نختصي فنهانا النبي (ص) عن ذلك ثم رخص لنا بعد أن ننكح المرأة بالثوب إلى أجل ثم قرأ عبد الله «يا أيها الذين آمنوا لا تحرموا طيبات» الآية متفق عليه.
‘
[13] Neel ul Autar, 7/594; and He said
‘
عن بن مَسْعُودٍ قال كنا نَغْزُو مع رسول اللَّهِ (ص) ليس مَعَنَا نِسَاءٌ فَقُلْنَا أَلا نَخْتَصِي فَنَهَانَا عن ذلك ثُمَّ رَخَّصَ لنا بَعْدُ أَنْ نَنْكِحَ الْمَرْأَةَ بِالثَّوْبِ إلَى أَجَلٍ ثُمَّ قَرَأَ عبد اللَّهِ «يا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لا تُحَرِّمُوا طَيِّبَاتِ ما أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ لَكُمْ» الْآيَةَ مُتَّفَقٌ عليه.
‘
[14] Exact wordings of this narration are
‘
3263 - حدثنا أبو العباس محمد بن يعقوب ، ثنا بحر بن نصر الخولاني قال : قرئ على عبد الله بن وهب ، أخبرك معاوية بن صالح عن أبي الزاهرية، عن جبير بن نفير قال : حججت فدخلت على عائشة رضي الله عنها ، فقالت لي : يا جبير تقرأ المائدة ؟ فقلت : نعم قالت : “ أما إنها آخر سورة نزلت فما وجدتم فيها من حلال ، فاستحلوه ، وما وجدتم من حرام فحرموه .
هذا حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخين ولم يخرجاه .
‘
Jubair bin Nafeer says that I went for Haj, and met Ayesha. She asked me: Do You recited al Maidah? I said: Yes. She said: This is the last Surah revealed, so what You find Halal/allowed in this, that is Halal/allowed. And what You find Haram/prohibited in it, That is Haram
(Hakim says) Hadeeth is Sahih on terms of Sheikhain, but it was not written
‘
In Mustadrak Imam Hakim with research of Sheikh Maqbal al Wida’i, 2/370, Book of Tafsir, Tafsir of Surat ul Maidah, Sheikh gave his opinion regarding this chain, and said
‘
“Mawia bin Salih and Abu Zahriya, who is Hadir bin Kareeb, and Jubair bin Nafeer are not narrators of Bukhari, so Hadeeth in Sahih on terms of Muslim only”
Other Scholars accepting its authenticity include
(a)Sheikh Ahmad Shakir who mentioned it in Umda tu Tafaseer,2/619; which means it is authentic as per Him
(b) and Researcher Kamran Tahir whoauthenticated it in Urdu version of Tafsir Ibn Kathir (2/43) as Sahih Sanad;authenticated it as Sahih
‘
[15]Tafsir Ibn Kathir, online link
‘
[16] We have written an article in this regard, which can be seen here
‘
http://ahlubait.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/verse-of-mutaa-was-revealed-after-battle-of-oatas-authentic-narration/

 

Courtesy : http://www.shiaforums.net/vb/threads/tehreef-in-hadeeth-about-muta%E2%80%99a-in-sahih-bukhari.15315/

A Shi'ite View of the Companions - Part 2

"The Arabs are the worst in unbelief and hypocrisy, and most fitted  to be in ignorance of the command which Allah hath sent down to His  Messenger: But Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. [9:97]"

     "Hast thou not turned thy thought to those who declare that they believe in the revelations that have come to thee and to those before thee?  Their (real) wish is to resort together for judgment (in their  disputes) to the Evil (Tagut) though they were ordered to reject him.

     But Satan's wish is to lead them astray far away (from the Right).[4:60]"

     "In their hearts is a disease; and Allah has increased their disease:And grievous is the chastisement they (incur), because they lied (to themselves). [2:10]"

Now let us look at the following verse:

"Has not the time arrived for the Believers that their hearts in all humility should engage in the remembrance of Allah and of the Truth which has been revealed (to them), and that they should not become like those to whom was given The Book aforetime, but long ages passed over them and their hearts grew hard?  For many among them are rebellious transgressors. [57:16]"

There may be some translations which state that the above verse is meant to address the Jews and the Christians.  That is not true, because it contradicts the verse itself. First, Allah (SWT) is addressing the companions and THEN comparing them to the Jews and the Christians.  How then could it be that Allah (SWT) tells the Jews and the Christians: "Has not the time arrived for the Believers that their hearts in all humility should engage in the remembrance of Allah..."  and then tell them: "...and that they should not become like those to whom was given The Book aforetime..."  Why would Allah (SWT) compare the Christians (or the Jews) to themselves? Does that make sense?  No, and Allah (SWT) doesn't contradict Himself (SWT).  Rather, the verse was revealed as a questioning by Allah (SWT) regarding some of the the Muhajiroon (the Immigrants), who 17 years after the Quran was revealed, had still not fully believed in their HEARTS. Allah (SWT), as a result, showed disapproval. Again, at the end, Allah points out that among them are many rebellious transgressors.

As we mentioned, there are some verses in Quran which admired the first faction among the companions. Nevertheless, these verses do not include ALL the companions. Quran often uses the phrase "believers among them" or "those who proceeded in belief among them" which shows it does not address the whole companions. In fact some hypocrites were among the companions.

If hypocrites were known among the companions they would be no longer hypocrites and would become known enemy.

Moreover, when Allah states I WAS pleased with them till today, it does not imply that they will also be good tomorrow. It is inconceivable that Allah will give a permanent immunity to some people who supposedly have done some good things earlier, but they shed the blood of thousands of innocent Muslims later after the departure of Prophet. If it were so, it would mean that a companion could cancel all the Quranic rules and the instructions of the Prophet. However, as I mentioned, Shia do not discredit all the companions. There were companions who are in great respect for us. These are those whom Allah admired in the Holy Quran. As you might have noticed, those verses in the Holy Quran do not include all the companions. When

Allah states:

 9:100 And those who preceded (in belief), FROM AMONG Immigrants and Helpers and those who followed them in what was good, Allah * WAS * satisfied with them; He has prepared for them gardens under which rivers flow to dwell therein forever. That is the great felicity.

 9:101 And (however) among the ARABS AROUND YOU ARE HYPOCRITES, and also among the people of Madina (there are some who) persist in hypocrisy whom you (O Muhammad) DO NOT KNOW. We, We know   them, and We shall punish them twice; then they will be sent to a painful doom.

The above verses show that:

   1- Allah WAS satisfied with them, but may not be applicable later.

   2- Allah addressing those who preceded in belief from among them, thus  it means He is not addressing all of the companions.

   3- Immediately in the next verse, Allah talks about the hypocrites  around Prophet who pretend to be his sincere companions and even Prophet does not know them according to the above verse. This is in conformity with the traditions of Sahih al-Bukhari mentioned above  that Allah will say to His Prophet that "You do not know what these  companions have done after you left them."

Of course, there are verses in Quran in which Allah uses past tense verb, but it is intended as present and/or future tense verb. However it is not always the case. There are many verses in Quran in which Allah clearly states that He changes His decisions in time based on our actions at each instant of time. Allah is not in the domain of time, but He has ability to change his decision in the dimension of time. Of course He previously know what He will to change later, and He has the foreknowledge of everything. He does not treat a believer in a bad manner today, even though He knows that this believer will become apostate tomorrow.

To clarify this point, please see verses of Quran such as 8:65-66, 7:153,16:110, 16:119, 13:11, in which Allah clearly states He changes His decision based on our behavior. You can locate many verses like these in Quran.

Thus Allah's judgment about human beings changes in time according to our actions. If we do something good, He will get please with us, and then if we do something bad, He gets angry from us, and so on. Companions are not exempt from this rule. Anybody who does good deeds, Allah was pleased with him, no matter if he was companion or not.

Allah is JUST. He does not discriminate between companion and others who live at this time. Nobody is guaranteed to go to paradise if he or she does wrong things, kills innocents,... . Otherwise Allah is not just. Allah states in Quran that "Everybody is responsible for what he has

done." (Quran 74:38).

Allah Also states: "Fulfill your propmise, so that I fullfill My Promise." (Quran 2:40). Thus even if we assume for the sake of argument that the verse 9:100 implies "all" the companions have been promised Paradise, the verse 2:40 clearly states that if those people break their convenant after the death of the messenger of Allah and kill innocents, then Allah will not fulfill His promise for them either.

Let us also look at the following Quranic verses which clearly shows that even a person with high virtues who deserves paradise, can BURN OUT all his good deeds (Habt of Amal) at once! So never judge people for their early good work (if any!). We should always look at the final result of each person. Even prophet didn't know what will be his destiny till he died (i.e., till he passed his final exam!) because he had freedom to do wrong things too.

Allah said: "(O Prophet) If you ascribe a partner to Allah, your work will BURN OUT, and you will be among the losers." (Quran 39:65)

If prophet's deeds are in danger of BURNING, it is clear how to judge for the companions. Of course prophet did not burn out his deeds, but there was potential of danger of burning for him too.

Allah also said: "And if any of you turn back from their faith and die in disbelief, their works BURN OUT and will be of no use in this world and Hereafter, and they will be companions of Fire for ever." (Quran 2:217)

He, Exalted, also said: "Those who become unbeliever after they have been believer, and grow violent in disbelief, their repentance will not be accepted and such people are those who go astray." (Quran 3:90)

He also said: "On that day (Doomsday) some faces will be bright and some faces will be dark. To those whose faces will be dark (will be said:) Did you reject faith after accepting it? Taste the penalty for rejecting faith!" (Quran 3:106)

Allah also said: "Those who believe, then reject faith, then believe (again), and then reject faith (again) and go on in disbelief, Allah will not forgive them nor guide them on the way." (Quran 4:137)

So it is quite possible for a believer whom Allah is satisfied with him, to become unbeliever tomorrow. Otherwise if somebody is promised that Allah is satisfied with him forever and unconditionally (no mater he kills innocents or does any other wrong thing later), then it means that he is no longer under the test of Allah, which is in contradiction with several verses of Quran.

A Shi'ite View of the Companions - Part 1

The topic in this article is how the Shia view the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH&HF).  In this part we shall look at Allah's (SWT) opinion, as stated in the Quran, with regards to the companions as well as the Prophet's (PBUH&HF) opinion through authentic Sunni traditions.

============

Introduction

============

The Shia do not have a unique opinion towards the companions of the Prophet. Based on the relative authenticity and interpretations of the transmitted traditions, some arrive at different conclusions for the second faction of the companions mentioned below. Which tradition is more authentic and what is its correct meaning, is something debatable. However, here, I provide what is considered to be a typical Shi'ite position in this regard.

The Shia divide the companions into three factions: First, are those who believed in Allah (SWT), believed in the Prophet (PBUH&HF), and gave all they could for the sake of Islam.  These are the highest in rank. These companions ALWAYS supported the Prophet and were WITH him. They never disobeyed him in every other issue, nor did they ever accused him of talking non-sense! (may Allah protect us). Examples include, but are not limited to, Ali Ibn Abi Talib (AS), Abu Dhar al-Ghifari, Salman al-Farsi, Miqdad, Amar Ibn Yasir, Jabir Ibn Abdillah al-Ansari, ... may Allah (SWT) be pleased with them.

The second group, are those who were Muslims, but were not sincere in their acts.

The third group, are those who became apostate after the death of Prophet as al-Bukhari recorded (see below), or those who neither believed in Allah (SWT), nor the Prophet (PBUH&HF) in the first place, but managed to infiltrate the Islamic isles to be included among the Muslims.  These are the hypocrites, like Abu Sufyan, his son Muawiyah, and his grandson Yazid. Yazid, when he became caliph, said:

"Hashimite played with the throne, but no revelation was revealed, nor was there a true message!!!"

Sunni references:

- History of al-Tabari, Arabic, 13, p2174

- Tadhkirat al-Khawas, Sibt Ibn al-Jawzi al-Hanafi, p261

"Hashimite" is the clan and tribe of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), and this is an intentional pun suggesting that the Prophet (PBUH&HF) was a liar, not a true prophet. The "throne (sovereignty)" is an allusion to the control of the affairs of Mecca and the entire region, meaning that the tribe of Hashim controlled the entire region by virtue of the Message of Islam and that Muhammad (PBUH&HF) is the chosen Prophet, but really there was no revelation and there was no message!!!  That is Yazid's opinion of Allah (SWT), Islam, and the Prophet (PBUH&HF).  His father, Muawiyah, and hisgrandfather, Abu Sufyan, were no better. At the beginning the reign of Uthman when Umayad occupied the prominent positions, Abu Sufayn said:

     "O Children of Umayyah! Now that this kingdom has come to you, play with it as the children play with a ball, and pass it from one to another in your clan. We are not sure whether there is a paradise or hell, but this kingdom is a reality."

Sunni references:

- al-Isti'ab, by Ibn Abd al-Barr, v4, p1679

- Sharh Ibn Abil Hadid, v9, p53 which quotes the last sentence as follows:

  "By him in whose name Abu Sufyan swears, there is neither punishment nor  reckoning, neither Garden nor Fire, neither Resurrection nor Day of  Judgment!"

Then Abu Syfyan went to Uhud and kicked at the grave of Hamza (the uncle of the Prophet who was martyred in the Battle of Uhud in fighting against Abu Sufyan) and said: "O Abu Ya'la! See that the kingdom which you fought against has finally come back to us." (Sharh Ibn Abil Hadid, v16, p136).

Now let us see what his son, Muawiyah, said when he took over the Caliphate:

  "I didn't fight you to pray, fast, and pay charity, but rather to be your leader and control you!!!"

This is an indication that Muawiyah never cared about any of Islam' mandates, nor Allah's (SWT) orders; rather his war was politically motivated to gain control of the whole region and take over the Caliphate.

It is no wonder or surprise!  Muawiyah poisoned Imam al-Hasan (AS), the greater son of Fatimah (AS) -- the daughter of the Prophet (PBUH&HF).

Sunni references:

- Tadhkirat al-Khawas, Sibt Ibn al-Jawzi al-Hanafi, pp 191-194

- Ibn Abd al-Barr, in his "Seera"

- Abu Nu'aym

- Also reported by the traditionists such as al-Suddi and al-Sha'bi.

Then Yazid, the Muawiyah's son, slaughtered Imam al-Husain (AS), in the desert of Karbala in Iraq, and ordered that Imam al-Husain's (AS) head be carried on a spear and displayed in towns for people to see it!  May Allah avenge the Prophet's family!!! May Allah avenge the Prophet's family!!!

May Allah avenge the Prophet's (PBUH&HF) family!!!

==============

The Holy Quran

==============

Now let us look at the Holy Quran for different categories:

The first faction of the companions are characterized by Allah (SWT) in this verse:

     "Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and those who are with him are strong against the unbelievers, (but) compassionate amongst each other.  Thou wilt see them bow and prostrate themselves (in prayer), seeking Grace from Allah and (His) Good Pleasure.  On their faces are their marks, (being) the traces of their prostration.  This is their similitude in the Taurat (Torah); And their similitude in the Gospel is: Like a seed which sends forth its blade, then makes it strong; it then becomes thick, and it stands on its own stem, (filling) the sowers with wonder and delight.  As a result, it fills the Unbeliever with rage at them.  Allah has promised those among them who believe  and do righteous deeds Forgiveness, and a great Reward. [48:29]"

These companions (May Allah (SWT) be Pleased With Them), the Shia and the Sunnis have NO quarrel about.  As such, they will not be discussed here.

However, note what Allah (SWT) in His (SWT) infinite wisdom states in the last line: "Allah has promised those among them who believe and do righteous deeds Forgiveness, and a great Reward."  Now, note "...those among them..."  Why didn't Allah (SWT) say "Allah has promised ALL OF THEM?"  Because not all of them were righteous!  That's what the Shia are trying to convey to the world!  The Sunnis, whenever they bless the Prophet (PBUH&HF), they also bless ALL the companions, with NO exception.  Why did Allah (SWT), their Creator (SWT), make an exception, while the Sunni Muslims don't?  This is a sign for those who reflect...

Moreover, the verse specifies those who were WITH the Prophet, which means those who were obedient to him and did not oppose/discredit him. Certainly the hypocrites walked with the Prophet and used to attach themselves to him, yet NO Muslim ever entitle them to the above verse which states "those who were WITH him".

As for the second faction of the companions, Allah (SWT) said:

     "O ye who believe! What is the matter with you, that when ye are asked  to go forth in the Cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter.  Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place; But Him ye would not harm in the least, For Allah hath power over all things."[9:38-39]

This is a clear indication that some of the companions were lazy during thecall to Jihad and other activities, and, thus, deserved the above reprimand by Allah (SWT). This is not the only instance where Allah (SWT) threatened to replace them:

     "... If you turn back (from the path), He will substitute in your  stead another people; then they would not be like you! [47:38]"

Could you tell me Who Allah is referring by "you" in the above verse? Allah also said:

     "O you who believe! Do not raise your voices above the voice of prophet ... lest your deeds become null while you do not perceive."

     (Quran 49:2).

Authentic Sunni traditions confirm that there have been some companions who used to oppose the Prophet's order and quarrel with him in several occasions:

a) There was the issue of the captives of the battle "Badr" that the  Prophet ordered their freedom for payment of the ransom money (Fidyah),and these companions went against it.

b) There was the battle of "Tabook" that the Prophet ordered to slaughter  the camels, to save their lives, and the same people went against it.

c) There was the treaty of "Hudabiyyah" that the Prophet wanted to make peace with people of Mecca, and the very same companions went against it and they even cast doubt about the prophethood of Muhammad (PBUH&HF).

d) There was the battle of "Hunain" where they accused the Prophet of  injustice in distributing the war booty.

e) There was the appointment of "Usamah Ibn Zayd" who was assigned as the  leader of Islamic army by the Prophet, and these companions disobeyed  the order to follow him.

f) There was a tragic Thursday when the Messenger of Allah wanted to state his will, and the very same companions accused him of talking non-sense and prevented him to do so.

And there are many more of such reports which can be even found in Sahih al-Bukhari.

As for the third faction of the companions, there is a whole chapter in the holy Quran addressing them: "al-Munafiqun --The Hypocrites -- Ch. 63", and beside that there are many other verses in this regard as well. Allah (SWT) states in the Quran:

     "Muhammad is no more than a Messenger: many were the Messengers that passed away before him.  If he died or were slain, will ye then turn back on your heels?  If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah; But Allah (on the other hand) will swiftly reward those who (serve Him) with gratitude. [3:144]"

This verse was revealed when some of the companions ran away from the battle of Uhud, when they falsely heard that Prophet was killed. Although they were forgiven by Prophet later, but the above verse gives a possibility that some of the companions may abandon Islam if the Prophet (PBUH&HF) dies. But Allah (SWT) makes exceptions: "...those who (serve Him) with gratitude." Again, Allah (SWT) states:

     "O ye who believe! If any from among you turn back from his faith, soon will Allah produce a people whom He will love as they will love Him, --Lowly with the Believers, Mighty against the Rejecters,fighting in the way of Allah, and never afraid of the reproaches of such as find fault.  That is the Grace of Allah, which He will bestow on whom He pleaseth.  And Allah encompasseth all, And He knoweth all things. [5:54]"

========================

The Authentic Traditions

========================

Before giving more straightforward verses from Quran for this third group,let me give you some traditions from Sahih al-Bukhari which confirms apostasy for them. Since al-Bukhari has CONFIRMED the authenticity of the following tradition, I hope you do not consider him a "Kafir" after reading these traditions.

NOTE: As usual, the numbers match the Arabic-English version of Sahih al-Bukhari which is available in almost every places. The first number before the point indicates  the volume number, and the number after the point  indicates the tradition number (NOT the page number). For  example Hadith 8.578 indicates volume 8, tradition #578.

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.578

Narrated 'Abdullah:

The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount." 'Abdullah added: The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount, and some of you will be brought in front of me till I will see them and then they will be taken away from me and I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' It will be said, 'You do not know what they did after you had left.'

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.584

Narrated Anas:

  The Prophet said, "Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from me, whereupon I will say, 'My companions!' Then it will be said, 'You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you." (also Sahih Muslim, part 15, pp 53-54)

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.585

Narrated Abu Hazim from Sahl bin Sa'd:

     The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor (forerunner) at the Lake- Fount, and whoever will pass by there, he will drink from it and whoever will drink from it, he will never be thirsty. There will come to me some people whom I will recognize, and they will recognize me, but a barrier will be placed between me and them." Abu Hazim added: Nu'man bin Abi 'Aiyash, on hearing me, said. "Did you hear this from Sahl?" I said, "Yes." He said, " I bear witness that I heard Abu Said al-Khudri saying the same, adding that the Prophet said: 'I will say:

     They are my companions. Then it will be said to me, 'You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you left'. I will say, 'Far removed, far removed (from mercy), those who changed after me." Abu Huraira narrated that the Prophet said, "On the Day of Resurrection a group of companions will come to me, but will be driven away from the Lake-Fount, and I will say, 'O Lord (those are) my companions!' It will be said, 'You have no knowledge as to what they innovated after you left; they turned apostate as renegades (reverted from the true Islam)."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.586

Narrated Ibn al-Musaiyab:

     "Some men from my companions will come to my Lake-Fount and they will be driven away from it, and I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' It will be said, 'You have no knowledge of what they innovated after you left: they turned APOSTATE as renegades (reverted from true Islam)."

     (also Sahih Muslim, part 10, p64, also P59)

Sahih Bukhari Hadith: 8.587

Narrated Abu Huraira:

     The Prophet said, "While I was sleeping, a group (of my followers were  brought close to me), and when I recognized them, a man (an angel) came out from amongst (us) me and them, he said (to them), 'Come along.' I asked, 'Where?' He said, 'To the (Hell) Fire, by Allah' I asked, 'what is wrong with them?' He said, 'They turned APOSTATE as renegades after you left.' Then behold! (Another) group (of my followers) were brought close to me, and when I recognized them, a man (an angel) came out from (me and them) he said (to them); Come along.'

     I asked, "Where?' He said, 'To the (Hell) Fire, by Allah.' I asked,

     What is wrong with them?' He said, 'They turned APOSTATE as renegades after you left. So I did not see anyone of them escaping except a few who were like camels without a shepherd."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.592

Narrated Asma 'bint Abu Bakr:

     The Prophet said, "I will be standing at the Lake-Fount so that I will  see whom among you will come to me; and some people will be taken away from me, and I will say, 'O Lord, (they are) from me and from my followers.' Then it will be said, 'Did you notice what they did after you? By Allah, they kept on turning on their heels (turned away from true Islam).' " The sub-narrator, Ibn Abi Mulaika said, "O Allah, we seek refuge with You from turning on our heels, or being put to trial  in our religion."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 9.172

Narrated Asma':

     The Prophet said, "I will be at my Lake-Fount (Kauthar) waiting for whoever will come to me. Then some people will be taken away from me whereupon I will say, 'My followers!' It will be said, 'You do not know they turned APOSTATES as renegades (deserted their religion).'"

     (Ibn Abi Mulaika said, "Allah, we seek refuge with You from turning on our heels from the (Islamic) religion and from being put to trial").

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 9.173

Narrated 'Abdullah:

     The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount (Kauthar) and some men amongst you will be brought to me, and when I will try to  hand them some water, they will be pulled away from me by force whereupon I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' Then the Almighty will say, 'You do not know what they did after you left, they introduced new things into the religion after you.'"         

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 9.174

Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd:

 I heard the Prophet saying, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount (Kauthar), and whoever will come to it, will drink from it, and whoever will drink from it, will never become thirsty after that.

     There will come to me some people whom I know and they know me, and then a barrier will be set up between me and them." Abu Sa'id al-  Khudri added that the Prophet further said: "I will say those people are from me. It will be said, 'You do not know what changes and new  things they did after you.' Then I will say, 'Far removed (from mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed after me!' "

   

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.434

Narrated 'Uqba bin 'Amir:

The Prophet went out and offered the funeral prayer for the martyrs of the (battle of) Uhud and then ascended the pulpit and said, "I am your predecessor and I am a witness against you. By Allah, I am now looking at my Tank-lake (Al-Kauthar) and I have been given the keys of the treasures of the earth (or the keys of the earth). By Allah! I am not afraid that you become polytheist after me, but I am afraid that you will start competing for it (i.e., the pleasures and treasures of this world).

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 3.555

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Prophet said, "By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, I will drive some people out from my (sacred) Fount on the Day of Resurrection as strange camels are expelled from a private trough."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 4.375

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

     ... The Prophet said to the Ansar: "You will find after me some great selfishness (UTHRAH). Then be patient till you meet Allah and meet His Apostle at al-Kauthar (i.e. a fount in Paradise)." (Anas added:) But  we did not remain patient.

Note: In English translation of Sahih al-Bukhari 'Uthrah' (selfishness) has been translated to another word, but the rest are the same.

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 5.488

Narrated al-Musaiyab:

I met al-Bara bin 'Azib and said (to him). "May you live prosperously! You enjoyed the company of the Prophet and gave him the Pledge of allegiance (of al-Hudaibiya) under the Tree (of al-Hudaybiyah)." On that, al-Bara' said, "O my nephew! You do not know what we have done after him (i.e. his death)."

=========

These traditions, nonetheless, indicate the Prophet's (PBUH&HF) knowledge and awareness that some of his companions will change after him (PBUH&HF), and, therefore, will be condemned to hell.  This is another reason why the Shia maintain that the Prophet (PBUH&HF) MUST have had a special vicegerent

to trust the affairs of the Ummah (Nation) to -- a vicegerent that will NOT mutilate the religion and will remain steadfast until he meets his Creator (SWT).

It is a known fact that the companions quarreled after the death of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), and wars were waged.  The fact, again and again, that the companions were divided is illuminated by Allah (SWT) in the following verse:

     "Let there be among you an Ummah inviting to all that is good, enjoining what is right, and forbidding what is wrong.  They are the ones to attain felicity.  Be not like those who are divided amongst themselves and fall into disputations after receiving Clear Signs: For them is a dreadful Chastisement. On the Day when some faces will be (lit up with) white, and some faces will be (in the gloom of) black: To those whose faces will be black, (will be said): Did ye reject Faith after accepting it?  Taste then the Chastisement for rejecting Faith." [3:104-106]

The above verse shows among the companion there were a group (Ummah) who will remain righteous. The verse emphasizes that this Ummah is AMONG THEM so it does not cover all of them. However. the latter part the verse describes the thrid group who were apostatized (turned back on) their faith after the Prophet (PBUH&HF) died.  The verse indicates that on the Day of Judgment, there will be two factions: one with white-lit faces, and the other with black-lit faces; that's another hint that the companions will be divided.

Here are some more verses from the Quran that address the third group of companions and their actions:

     "They swear by Allah that they said nothing (evil), but indeed they  uttered blasphemy, and they uttered it after accepting Islam: and they meditated a plot which they were unable to carry out: this revenge of theirs was (their) only return for the bounty with which Allah and His Messenger had enriched them! If they repent, it will be best for them: But if they turn back (to their evil ways), Allah will punish them with a grievous chastisement in this life and in the Hereafter: They shall have none on earth to protect or help them. [9:74]"

     "So He hath put as a consequence hypocrisy into their hearts, (to  last) till the Day whereon they shall meet Him: because they broke their Covenant with Allah, and because they lied (again and again).

     [9:77]"