Egyptian Mohammed Morsi praying with open hands in Masjid-un-Nabawi |
Think about this matter from an outside perspective. Non muslims will no doubt mock the fact that muslims are still not able to ascertain how the Prophet(s.a.w.w) prayed. Consider this. After the declaration of Prophethood, the Prophet(s.a.w.w) was Alive for 23 years, which means that he(s.a.w.w) must have offered Salat in front of the sahaba at least 7,00,000 times, and yet Muslims are still unable to agree on whether the Prophet(s.a.w.w) would pray with his arms open or folded! The confusion is not a new phenomena; rather it dates back to the sahaba themselves!
We read in sahih bukhari…vol.
4…book 56…hadees no. 664:
Narrated Aisha:
That she used to hate that one
should keep his hands on his flanks while praying. She said that the jew used
to do so.
This tradition shows that there
were indeed people [who were either sahaba or tabaeen] in times of Aisha, who
used to pray while putting their hands at sides [may be on flanks, or may be
straight].
.
So the question is why did these
sahaba or tabaeen practice in this manner?
Doesnt it show that there were
indeed very basic differences between companions themselves? Is it not a sad
irony that the greatest generation of the salaf [who had the fortune of sitting
in the midst of the Prophet(s.a.w.w) for 23 years with rasool(s.a.w.w)], were
unable to be 100% sure where rasool(s.a.w.w) used to put his hands during
salah.
The easiest way to resolve such
confusion would be to refer the matter back to Allah(s.w.t) and his
Prophet(s.a.w.w) as is stipulated in the qur’an. Therefore we hereby ask our
opponents on the basis of the qur’an, to show us qur’anic evidence that the
arms should be folded during Salat. Lets turn to the words of the
Prophet(s.a.w.w), about whom Allah(s.w.t) says in al-qur’an 4:65:
But no, by the lord, they can
have no [real] faith, until they make thee judge in all disputes between them,
and find in their souls no resistance against thy decisions, but accept them
with the fullest conviction.
In light of this instruction
consider the guidance of our Prophet(s.a.w.w):
I am leaving amongst you two
things, the qur’an and my ahl-ul-bait(a.s), if you follow them you will never
go astray.
Sahih muslim…part 7…kitab fada’il alsahabah…chapter 4 [fazail-e-Ali(a.s) ibn abi tAlib(a.s)]…published cairo…page 122-123
In light of this hadees it is
clear that we need to learn the method of Salat from the ahl-ul-bait(a.s). As
maulana shibli numani had said in his biography of abu haneefa.
We are confident that the act of
folding the hands cannot be [proven from the qur’an] nor from hadees which has
only nine traditions with chains. We challenge the ahl-e-sunnah to bring us a
sahih tradition where in accordance with the rules of ahl-e-sunnah, the
narrators are all thiqah.
One who offers Salat is like
soldier of Allah(s.w.t) and there is absolute consensus that ‘mehrab’ means the
place of war, if an officer tells his soldier to stand to attention and he
responds by folding his hands, what will his reaction be? If he folds his arms
this will be an objectionable act. Similarly Allah(s.w.t) says ‘qeema Salat’
that means stand striaght for Salat, if our arms are not straight then how is
this manner of Salat correct?
If we were to restrict the
discussion to the ordinance ‘qeema Salat’ from the qur’an, the verse actually
means stand straight, not being crooked, always remaining upright, and always
being stable etc, this place one at a 90 degree angle. When one does not remain
straight in Salat what trust can we have in the rest of the acts associated
with Salat ?
Islam is the deen of fitrah, and
Salat is accordingly a natural act. The opening of arms is a natural act. We
come into this world in the natural state with our hands straight, and when we
die, we also are laid in the grave with hands straight. When we come in this
world we come with open hands, when we go back to his majesty, we go with hands
open, and that is how we stand when we are offering prayers, it is the natural
state. Folding the arms is not a natural act. Salat by folding the arms is an
unnatural act and hence if we ask why it is perfoemed in this way, we neither
get a logical response nor a reliable narration. When men perform an unnatural
act there needs to be some rational basis for it.
Since Salat is the most superior
of acts of worship, and most liked by the creator, an unnatural act connected
to it will not be liked by Allah(s.w.t). Allah(s.w.t) declares in al-qur’an
24:41:
Seest thou not that it is
Allah(s.w.t) whose praises all beings in the heavens and on earth do celebrate,
and the birds [of the air] with wings outspread ? Each one knows its own [mode
of] prayer and praise. And Allah(s.w.t) knows well all that they do.
The verse proves that Salat is a
natural act and is performed with the arms out stretched. There is no qur’anic
evidence to support the unaturual act of closing the arms during Salat. If
mu’awiya’s followers insist on picking fault with the shi’a Salat, then allow
us to throw a challenge down to them:
Show us any verse from the
qur’an, hadees of the Prophet(s.a.w.w) or fatwa from your mufti declaring the
act of offereing Salat with the arms open to be an act of bidaa that negates
the Salat.
If nasibi try to counter this
asking that we prove the act of opening the hands from the qur’an, then we will
point out, that there is clear evidence of Allah(s.w.t) deeming the traits of
closing hands to be of yahhud, munafiqs and those that will perish in the fire
on the day of judgement.
.
Condemnation of folding the arms
Al-qur’an 9:67:
Yousuf Ali translation: “the
hypocrites, men and women, [have an understanding] with each other: they enjoin
evil, and forbid what is just, and are close with their hands. They have
forgotten Allah(s.w.t); so he hath forgotten them. Verily the hypocrites are
rebellious and perverse.”
This verse stipulates that
closing the hands is the sign of a hypocrite and they are condemned in
connection with this act. If the hypoctite hadn’t closed his hands Allah(s.w.t)
would not have condemned him, hence such an act cannot be incoprprated into an
act of worship. When Allah(s.w.t) condemns the closing of hands, then he would
not incoprpare this same act into the great act of worship, Salat. The verse is
of general application, and is not restricted to a specific individual. At no
other times have there been any orders to close the arms such as when
conducting, hajj, giving zakat, participating in jihad. This proves that the
condemnation of folding the arms is common.
Al-qur’an 5:64:
Yousuf Ali translation: “the jews
say: ‘Allah(s.w.t)‘s hand is tied up.’ be their hands tied up and be they
accursed for the [blasphemy] they utter. Nay, both his hands are widely
outstretched: he giveth and spendeth [of his bounty] as he pleaseth. But the
revelation that cometh to thee from Allah(s.w.t) increaseth in most of them
their obstinate rebellion and blasphemy. Amongst them we have placed enmity and
hatred till the day of judgment. Every time they kindle the fire of war,
Allah(s.w.t) doth extinguish it; but they [ever] strive to do mischief on
earth. And Allah(s.w.t) loveth not those who do mischief.”
Allah(s.w.t) cursed the jews for
saying that his hands are tied, hence the act of folding hands is a bad act,
and whoever attributes this to someone is cursed. This verse can also be linked
to Salat, since good deeds cannot no be achieved via closing one’s hands, Salat
is a good deed, and hence cannot be be performed by closing the hands. These
individuals are astrayed from the correct path, and are criminals and the
muslims should be at distance from their customs, as Allah(s.w.t) advises us.
We read in al-qur’an 68:35-36:
Shall we then treat the
[submitting] muslims like the mujrimûn [criminals, polytheists and
disbelievers, etc] ? What is the matter with you ? How judge you ?
In light of this verse how can
the folding of the arms be correct ? Particularly when the method of reading
Salat has been set by Allah(s.w.t), then how can he(s.w.t) like the act of
folding the arms ? The act of folding the hands is like the act of a criminal,
when they are brought before the court in handcuffs.
Similarly we read in al-qur’an
17:29:
Yousuf Ali translation: make not
thy hand tied [like a niggard's] to thy neck, nor stretch it forth to its
utmost reach, so that thou become blameworthy and destitute.
It is clear that Allah(s.w.t) not
only hates that act of folding the arms, but he(s.w.t) does not even wish to
hear about such an act. Anyone who seeks to associate this to Allah(s.w.t) even
by mistake, is worthy of being cursed and his curse is such that both his hands
will be tied. This makes it clear that Allah(s.w.t) states both his hands are
open, and this refers to the hands of the Prophet(s.w.t).
In the shi’a madhab men and women
read Salat differently, men open their arms, placing their hands by their
sides. Women open the arms and place them separately, straight in front of them.
Non shi’a men and women fold their arms. We have the words of Allah(s.w.t)
al-qur’an 9:67:
Yousuf Ali translation: the
hypocrites, men and women, [have an understanding] with each other: they enjoin
evil, and forbid what is just, and are close with their hands. They have
forgotten Allah(s.w.t); so he hath forgotten them. Verily the hypocrites are
rebellious and perverse.
It is clear that closing the arms
is a sign of hypocrites and their men and women have the same method, their
arms are folded. Some people translated ‘yud’ as fist, but we tell them that in
the verses of wudhu Allah(s.w.t) clarifies the meaning of yud, and this makes
matters clear.
Al-qur’an 69:30:
Yousuf Ali translation: [the
stern command will say] ‘seize ye him, and bind ye him.’
A momin does not wish to share
any similarities with the jews, likewise folding the hands in the presence of
the creator.
.
How did the holy Prophet(s.a.w.w)
offer his prayers ?
One of the most unfortunate
dilemmas of muslims lies in the fact that the muslim sects can still not agree
on how the Prophet(s.a.w.w) performed Salat, there is a wide disparity in the
way each school prays. This difference is not only between the shi’as and the
sunnis, but even the sub sects of sunnis have differences amongst them in this
regard.
How can an action performed by
the Prophet(s.a.w.w) [which was not done on a few occasions in isolation] cause
so much confusion ? It is a fact that the holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) led the
congregational prayers five times daily until his last days, yet the
ahl-e-sunnah perform prayers in five different ways.
Following are the comments of the
sunni scholars on the issue:
the hanafis say that the males should
place their right hand over the left and place them below the navel and the
females should put their hands on the chest.
the hanbalis are of the view that both the
males and the females should put their right palms on the back of their left
hands and place them below the navel.
the shafis say that both the males and the
females should place their right palms on the back of their left hands and
place them above the navel but below the chest, as it is the sunnah.
Al-fiqa al-mazahib al-arba’a…page
399-400…compiled by allama abdul rehman al-jazeeri…published by ulema
academy…department of auqaaf…punjab
The early three sunni imams were born far
away from madina, but imam Malik bin anas was born there, he grew up he saw the
elders, the literary people and the scholars of madina offering prayers with
unfolded hands, and therefore he ordered that the prayers be offered likewise.
Allama ghulam rasool sa’eedi writes about him in sharh sahih muslim.
“according to imam Malik the
prayers should be offered with unfolded hands, he considers the folding of
hands as undesirable in obligatory prayers and permissible in nafl prayers.”
Sharh sahih muslim…vol. 1…page 590…by allama ghulam rasool sa’eedi…published lahore
The ahl’ul hadeeth have graded the
traditions in the “sihah sittah” on the folding of hands as weak, and place
their folded hands on their chests, this act is performed both by their men and
women.
Salat ar-rasool…page 190…compiled
by maulana muhammad sadiq sialkoti…published lahore
The writing of a sunni religious scholar from saudi arabia, regarding the folding of hands:
The uncertaintly over the issue
of placement of hands can be best examplified by the statement of sunni scholar
sheikh muhammad ilyas faysal in his book namaz-e-paighambar(s.a.w.w) wherein he
claims that he started the book sitting in the shadow of the holy kabba sitting
near the place of abraham, wrote a part of it in the mosque of nabawi and ended
it again sitting in the shadow of the holy kabba.
Namaz-e-paighambar(s.a.w.w)…sheikh
muhammad ilyas faysal…page 300…taqdeem muhammad shafeeq as’ad of medina
university…published by sunni publications [lahore]
A point to be noted is that on
pages 13-23 there are appraisals of the book by many esteemed sunni scholars
such as maulana muhammad as’ad madni’s successor of sheikh ul islam maulana
hussein ahmed madni, dr. Sayyed sher Ali [phd medina university and ex-educator
in nabawi mosque], maulana muhammad Malik kandhalwi [sheikh al hadeeth jamia
ashrafia lahore], maulana muhammad abdullah [speaker of central mosque,
islamabad] and others.
In that book he asks:
“should hands be folded below the
navel or above it? There is no certain and final divine judgement on this,
infact there are certain traditions on both the sides which have been discussed
by the hadeeth grading scholars, despite this, the traditions about the
placement of hands below the navel seem to be comparatively more authentic and
clearer.”
Namaz-e-paighambar(s.a.w.w)…page 120
The above mentioned statement proves that the sunnis do not have any conclusive proof for offering prayers with folded hands and the traditions on both the sides are weak, and as far as sheikh ilyas’s claim that the traditions about the placement of hands below the navel seem to be more authentic is concerned, the salafis state hadeeth purporting the placement of hands on the chest being more authentic and those about placing the hands below the navel are weak.
Many scholars amongst the ahl-e-sunnah deem both methods dropping and folding the arms to be acceptable, which is why mufti al baseer in column ‘baseer’ that formed part of the karachi based magazine noor al hidayath…vol. 2…october 1972…page 145 responsded to a query by fayz Allah khan as follws:
Question: shi’as drop their arms
when offereing Salat, and i have seen sunni’s folding their arms during Salat.
Ahl-e-hadeeth offer Salat by placing their hands on their upper chest. Which is
the obligatory method amongst these three? Should Salat be performed by keeping
the arms open, placing them over the chest or on the navel?
Answer: these differences are due
to problems that have no correlation with usool-e-deen, keep the arms open,
placing them over the chest or on the navel is not obligatory, it is a sunnah,
and the ulema from each sects produce hadeeth in relation to the opening and
folding of hands, hence none of these methods should be criticised. The
dropping of the hands is not restricted to the shi’a, amongst the sunni the
adherents of imam Malik pray with their arms open. Placing the arms over the
chest is not restricted to the ahl-e-hadeeth, rather amongst the sunnis the
adherents of imam hanbal [that includes the great saint abdul qadir] would
place their arms over the chest. Shaafi’s deem folding the arms above the navel
and the hanafi’s placing them below the navel to be the best method. There is
hence no need to go into deep discussions on this matter.
This proves that the ahl-e-sunnah are not in absolute agreement on the folding of the arms.
.
Strange comments by the sunni
religious scholars
We can all comprehend that holy
Prophet(s.a.w.w) offered the prayers in a single manner every time, and he
taught his companions that very same method of offering the prayers because
there is a famous tradition in bukhari ‘pray as you see me pray’. With this in
mind, which one of the five mentioned sunni ways of Salat did the holy
Prophet(s.a.w.w) practice? Did he(s.a.w.w):
Place his folded hands on his chest like
the salafis ?
Place his folded hands on his stomach like
the shafis ?
Place his hands below the navel or did he
offer the prayers with unfolded hands like the Malikis ?
Incapable of resolving this
confusion the ahl-e-sunnah offer some strange arguments, such as those recorded
by imam nawawi in his sharh-e-muslim:
Imam ahmed auza’i and ibne manzar
have said that it is up to the worshipper to perform the prayer in the way he
wants. Imam Malik said that a worshipper may fold his hands and place them on
his chest and he may pray with unfolded hands, and that is what the Malikis got
accustomed with, he further said that hands should be unfolded in obligatory
prayers and should be folded in nafl prayers and lais bin sa’ad also said the
same thing.
Sharh-e-muslim…nawawi…vol. 2…page
28…translated by maulana waheed uz-zaman…published by nomani book store
[lahore]
A similar accommodating view is
provided by maulana waheed uz-zaman, discussing the placement of the hands, and
whether they should be on the chest, stomach or below the navel, or open he
writes in the footnote of sunan ibn majah: no objection shall be made on this
because imam tirmidhi has said that each of them is permissible in the view of
scholars.
Sunan ibn majah…vol. 1…page
413-414…printed by mehtab company…urdu bazaar
Maulana waheed uz-zaman in sharh
bukhari while commenting on prayers, writes:
Ibn qasim has reported the
unfolding of hands from imam Malik, and that is what is practised by the imamia
sect[shi’as].
Tayseer al-bari sharh sahih
bukhari…vol. 1…page 489…published by taj company [karachi]
Imam Malik’s comment further adds to the confusion that the obligatory prayers shall be offered with unfolded hands and the nafl prayers shall be offered with folded hands. Were all these traditions prevailing in the same way during the days of Prophet(s.a.w.w) ? When the holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) led the congregational prayers did some of the companions fold their hands while offering the prayers and place them on their chests whilst others folded them, placing them under their navels ? Did some sahaba place them on their bellies and another group prayed with unfolded hands ? This would have never been the case, the holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) would never offer the morning prayers with his hands placed on the chest, noon prayers with his hands placed on the stomach, afternoon prayers with hands placed under the navel and maghrib and isha prayers with open hands, since we have mentioned that rasoolAllah(s.a.w.w) told the sahaba to pray as he prayed.
.
The ahl-ul-bait(a.s) method of
offering the prayers
The more the sunni scholars show
leniancy in this regard, the more determined are the shi’a jurists on this
issue that holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) offered prayers in a single manner, and the
same method has reached us through our imams. The imams from ahl-ul-bait(a.s)
used to offer prayers with unfolded hands. The shi’a books repeatedly quote
that imam jaffar sadiq(a.s) demonstrated this method when educating his
companion hammad about prayers.
Sheikh mohammad yaqoob
kulaini(r.a) and sheikh sadooq(r.a) state:
“our master turned his face
towards the kabba. Completely removed any contact between his hands and placed
his hands on his thighs, closed his fingers and placed his feet near to each
other.”
Al-shafi…translation of faru
al-kafi…vol. 2…page 65…published karachi
Manh lam yaz har al-fiqah…vol.
1…page 166…published karachi
Imam of ahl-e-sunnah shawkani in
nayl al-awtar…vol. 2…page 67 also admits that the ahl-ul-bait(a.s) offered
prayers with unfolded hands.
.
Prophet(s.a.w.w) didn’t teach the
folding of hands during prayers
Imam shawkani records the following
statemen of ibn manzar who was one of the teachers of imam bukhari:
قال
ابن المنذر في بعض تصانيفه: لم يثبت عن النبي صلى اللَّه عليه وآله وسلم في ذلك
شيء فهو مخير
There is no such proven tradition
from holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) in regard to folding of hands, therefore it is up to
the worshipper [whether he offers the prayers with either folded or unfolded
hands].
Nayl al-awtar…vol. 2…page 203
Sharh sunan abi daud…vol. 2…page
322…published by dar-ul-kutb ilmia [beirut]
This statement can be read on the
online version of nayl al-awtar at:
www.al-eman.com/islamlib/viewchp.asp?bid=253&cid=43#s1
.
Prophet(s.a.w.w) taught sahaba to
offer prayers without folded hands
حدثنا
عبد الله حدثني أبي ثنا أبو معاوية ثنا الأعمش عن مسيب بن رافع عن تميم بن طرفة عن
جابر بن سمرة قال : خرج علينا رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم ذات يوم فقال ما لي
أراكم رافعي أيديكم كأنها أذناب خيل شمس أسكنوا في الصلاة
Jabi bin samara said: once
Prophet(s.a.w.w) came to us and said: ‘why you fold your hands as the tails of
horses, you have to settle in prayer’.
Musnad ahmad ibn hanbal…vol.
5…page 93…tradition no. 20905
Shaykh shoib al-aranut stated
about this hadith:
The chain is sahih according to
muslim’s standard.
Imam shawkani records in nayl
al-awtar…vol. 2…page 200:
واحتج
القائلون ) بالإرسال بحديث جابر بن سمرة المتقدم بلفظ : (ما لي أراكم رافعي أيديكم)
Those who deem unfolding relied
on the tradition of jabir bin samara [why do you fold your hands].
.
Logical deduction that the holy
Prophet(s.a.w.w) prayed Salat with open hands
We read in sahih
al-bukhari…chapter on the virtues of the prayer hall…vol. 1…book 9…hadees no.
495:
Narrated abu qatada al-ansari:
Prophet(s.a.w.w) was praying and
he was carrying umama the daughters of zainab, the daughter of Allah(s.w.t)‘s
apostle(s.a.w.w) and she was the daughter of aas-bin rabi’a bin abdusshams.
When he prostrated, he put her down and when he stood, he carried her [on his neck].
We read sharh sahih
muslim…nawawi…vol. 1…page 205:
Narrated abu qatada al-ansari:
On one occasion Prophet(s.a.w.w)
lead the prayer congregation and umama the daughter of zainab, the daughter of
aas-bin rabi’a bin abdusshams was on his neck. When he prostrated, he put her
down and when he stood, he carried her [on his neck].
Now we notice, the ability to
hold a child and then recite takbeer, and then continue to pray Salat whilst
folding his hands ! If we are to accept this hadeeth from al-bukhari then we
have to accept that the Prophet(s.a.w.w) must have offered Salat with his hands
open.
.
Clear tradition proving that the
holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) prayed Salat with open hands
Ibn hajar asqalani writes in
talkhees al-habeer fi takhreej ahadeeth…vol. 1…page 333…bab sifat al-Salat:
الطَّبَرَانِيُّ
مِنْ حَدِيثِ مُعَاذٍ ،أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ
كَانَ إذَا كَانَ فِي صَلَاتِهِ رَفَعَ يَدَيْهِ قُبَالَ أُذُنَيْهِ ، فَإِذَا
كَبَّرَ أَرْسَلَهُمَا ثُمَّ سَكَتَ
Maaz narrates that when the
Prophet(s.a.w.w) would stand for Salat, he would raise both hands to his ears,
and after saying takbeer would then drop his hands.
We read in hidayah…vol. 1…page
104…part 20:
Imam Malik’s evidence for
dropping the hands lies in the fact that the Prophet(s.a.w.w) would start by
raising his hands for takbeer and would then drop his hands.
We read in fatawa…sheikh abdul
hai lukhnawi…vol. 1…page 326…first edition:
Ma’az says that when holy
Prophet(s.a.w.w) used to stand for offering the prayers, he used to raise his
hands up his his ears while reciting takbeer and then he would leave his hands
unfolded.
We read in umadatul qari sharah
sahih bukhari…vol. 9…page 20:
وحكى
ابن المنذر عن عبد الله بن الزبير والحسن البصري وابن سيرين أنه يرسلهما وكذلك عند
مالك
Ibn al-manzar narrated that
abdullah ibn zubair and al-hassan al-basri and ibn sireen that Prophet(s.a.w.w)
would offer Salat with his hands open and so did Malik.
The well known scholar of
ahl-e-hadeeth namely allamah waheed uz zaman writes:
Whoever says that offering
prayers with unfolded hands is a custom related to shi’as, that person is at
fault in this regard, because not only the shi’as but the whole muslim ummah
offered the prayers in the same way, especially during the life time of holy
Prophet(s.a.w.w). The companions did it the same way and no one knew about the
folding of hands.
Hadiyatul mahdi…by maulana waheed
uz zaman…vol. 1…page 126
.
Abdullah(l) ibn zubair would
offer Salat with his hands open
Imam ibn abi sheibah records in
his al-musnaf…vol. 1…page 344:
حدثنا
عفان قال حدثنا يزيد بن إبراهيم قال سمعت عمرو بن دينار قال كان بن الزبير إذا صلى
يرسل يديه
Amro bin dinar said: abdullah(l)
ibn zubair offered prayers without folding his hands.
.
Imams of ahl-e-sunnah saeed ibn
jabayr and ibn masayyib also prayed with their arms open
Allamah ibn abdul barr records
the following tradition in his book al tamheed:
عبد
الله بن العيزار قال كنت اطوف مع سعيد بن جبير فرأى رجلا يصلي واضعا إحدى يديه على
الأخرى هذه على هذه وهذه على هذه فذهب ففرق بينهما ثم جاء
Abd Allah ibn al-izar said, “i
used to make tawaf around the kaba with saeed ibn al-jubayr. Once, he saw a man
placing one hand over the other, so he went to him, separated his hands, and
then returned to me.”
Everyone is aware of the
prestigious place of saed bin jubayr among the early ulema of islam. According
to ibn kathir saeed bin jubayr was among the students of ibn abbas(r.a) and was
imam in various studies of tafsir and fiqha. [al bidayah wal nihayah…urdu…vol.
9…page 177…events of 94 hijri]
Ibn hajar asqlani writes about
saeed bin jubayr:
“….he narrated hadiths from ibn
abbas, ibn al-zubair, ibn umar, ibn maqal, uday ibn hatem, abi masood al-ansay,
abi saeed al-khudari, abu hurayra, abu musa al-asha’ari, al-dahak ibn qais
al-fehri, anas, amro ibn maymoon, abi abdulrahman al-sulami and lady aysha…..
Ibn abi mughera said that when people of kufa visited ibn abbas to ask him for
fatwa, he used to say to them: ‘isn’t saeed ibn jubayr among you?’…. Amro ibn
maymoon said that his father said: “saeed ibn jubayr passed away but there was
not a single person who had not attained knowledge from him”… abu al-qasem
al-tabari said: “he is a reliable imam and hujah on muslims”…..ibn haban said
that saeed was a jurist, worshiper, righteous and pious.”
Tahzib al-tahzib…vol. 4…page no.
14
It will be interesting to mention
here the position of hands saeed bin al mussayyib used to keep during Salat but
for those who know less about this notable person, we are presenting the text
recorded by ibn kathir in his book:
“he heard hadiths from hadrath
umer farooq, hadrath uthman, hadrath Ali(a.s), saeed and abu hurairah …zuhri
said: ‘i lived with him for seven years and i haven’t seen anyone more
knowledgeable than him’. Makhool said: ‘i went all over the word in pursue of
knowledge but never found anyone more knowledgeable than saeed’. Auzai says
that someone inquired zuhri and makhool about the most prestigious jurists in
their eyes, both of them unanimously said ‘saeed bin al mussayyib’. People used
to call him “faqih al fuqaha” [jurist of all jurists]… rabi` has stated with
reference to imam shafi that even a mursal hadith from saeed bin al mussayyib
is equal to a hassan hadith and it is equal to a sahih hadith in the eyes of
imam ahmed. Has also said that saeed bin al mussayyib is superior to all
tab`een… abu zar`ya said: ‘he was madani and thiqa imam’. Abu hatim said: ‘no
one among tabaeen was unique and superior to him’.
Al bidayah wal nihayah…urdu…vol.
9…page 179-180…events of 94 hijri…nafees book academy [karachi]
In the book ‘al tamheed’ by ibn
abdul barr we further read that imam of ahl-e-sunnah and jurists of all jusrits
saeed ibn al-musayyib used to pray like shi’a do:
عبد
الله بن يزيد قال ما رأيت سعيد بن المسيب قابضا يمينه على شماله في الصلاة كان
يرسلهما
Abd Allah ibn yazid said, “i
never saw saeed ibn al-musayyib holding his left hand with his right hand in
the prayer, he used to lay them straight.”
.
Imam Malik offered Salat with his
hands open
We read in fatah ul bari sharh
sahih bukhari…vol. 2…page 224:
وروى
بن القاسم عن مالك الإرسال وصار إليه أكثر أصحابه
“ibn qasim reports imam Malik
offered prayers without folding hands.”
The same narration has also been
recorded in tayseer al bari sharh sahih al bukhari, translated by e’tiqad
publishing house [delhi]…vol. 1…chapter 707…page 489.
We read in sharh
muslim…nawawi…vol. 1…page 173:
وعن
مالك رحمه الله روايتان أحداهما يضعهما تحت صدره والثانية يرسلهما ولا يضع إحداهما
على الأخرى وهذه رواية جمهور أصحابه وهي الأشهر عندهم
“the other narration of Malik is
that the hands should remain open in Salat, not closed and this opinion is the
most prevelant amongst the sahaba of Malik.”
Imam of ahl-e-sunnah ai’ni in
sharh kunz ul daqaiq…page 250…published in nolakshoor writes:
Imam Malik said that the order is
certainly about unfolding the hands but prayers can be offered with the folded
hands. The holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) and his companions used to offer prayers with
unfolded hands to the extent that their finger tips got red due to the blood
getting blocked there.
In al kifayah…vol. 1…page 250 and
al ghayah…vol. 1…page 250 both of which are commentaries of hidayah, we read
this narration:
“imam Malik gave a fatawa that
the hands should be pointing in the direction of the ground.”
Muhammad bin abdul rahman
dimishquee shafee writes in rehmath al ummah…vol. 1…page 37…dhikr Salat:
“the narration of imam Malik is
well known that he would pray with open hands”
Sunni scholar sherani in meezan
al kubra…vol. 1…page 150…dhikr Salath says:
“the fatawa of imam Malik is well
known, namely that he would pray with open hands.”
The wahabi and deobandi movement
ulma muhammad ismaeel shaheed writes in tanveer al aynayn…page 41:
“the syrian companions of imam
Malik bin anas narrate that he would offer Salat with his hands open. This
fatawa related to his obligatory Salath, and imam qasim narrates that he would
read the obligatory and sunnah prayers with open hands. Shuhaib also records
that Malik prayed open hands, and he narrates that imam Malik’s sahaba acted
upon this.”
We read in au jaza al masAlik fee
sharh muwatta imam Malik…vol. 3…page 166:
“there exist various narrations
from imam Malik on the opening of the hands, and amongst the Malikis the
opening of the hands is preferred and better, and imam Malik deemed the act of
folding during obligatory prayers to be makruh, but musthahab in sunnah
prayers.”
Maulana ishfaque ur-rehman in
imam Malik’s muwatta[arabic]…page 142…printed by noor muhammad asah al-mutabe
[karachi]…margin of kashful ghita writes:
That is, “about placing the right
hand on the left hand, imam Malik said: “in the obligatory prayers, i am not
even aware of the folding of hands.” So in obligatory prayers imam Malik wasn’t
convinced that the hands should be folded, and he considered it as abominable.
But while offering the nafl prayers in order to ease up things he allowed
folding the hands if the position of qayyam gets lengthy.” [he might have felt
the need for relaxation in the taraweih prayer, using one biddat to support
other biddat, what intelligence!].
About the folding of hands, in
the border of the very same page it is stated:
“imam Malik has allowed the
folding of hands for nafl prayers but for the obligatory prayers, it is not
allowed.”
Ibn al-qasim said:
MaAlik said about placing the
right hand over the left during Salat. He said: ‘i don’t know [of] that in the
obligatory [prayer].’ and he used to dislike it. ‘however, in voluntary prayers
[nawaafil], when the standing is extended, there is no harm in that [for one
who doesn’t] support himself by it.’
Al-mudawwanah…vol. 1…page 111
Now it is clear that imam Malik
has only allowed it to ease up the nafl prayers and has forbidden from acting
the same way in obligatory prayers, because he knew that Allah(s.w.t) dislikes
folded hands, and the ill and unwell have been provided with special
dispensation, even though there is no quranic order for it. MaAlik’s statement
in the last narration, “i don’t know of that in the obligatory prayer”,
suggests to anyone who is acquainted with his method of deducing legal rulings
that he is unaware of any conclusive evidence that would be strong enough to
consider placing the right hand over the left on the chest a sunnah act of the
obligatory prayer. Let us not forget that Malik studied under the top ranking
tabi’is and tabi’ tabi’is.
Imam Malik was one of the four
sunni imams. He issues a fatwa that the hands should remain open during Salat,
by doing so he deemed the folding of hands to be the incorrect method. This in
turn means that all of the sunni traditions on folding the hands are false, even
if there was a slight chance of them being sahih, Malik would have never had
the courage to issue an edict opposing them. Madina was the city wherein the
Prophet(s.a.w.w) taught directly, hence the people of this blessed city learnt
the method of Salat from their father / grandfather’s who had prayed behind the
Prophet(s.a.w.w), they accordingly prayed with their hands open. Imam Malik did
not care about the position held by the khaleefa of the time and gave a fatawa
stating that the hands must remain open. Is it believable that in the city of
the Prophet(s.a.w.w) the people would pray with their hands folded whilst their
imam would lead the Salat with his hands open? The ijmaa amongst the
ahl-e-sunnah is that any of the fatawas of their four imams is correct, hence
this fatawa is likewise correct, why do these nasibi get perturbed when shi’as
in schools and colleges enter their prayer rooms reading the Salat open hands?
They all stare at the shi’a praying, and start pointing at him with signs of
disgust expressed across their cursed faces!
.
All of the people of madina would
offer Salat with their arms open
The student of al muhaddith shah
wAliyullah, allamah muhammad moeen lahori writes in dhursuth al beeb…page
34…[lahore edition 1868] writes:
In my opinion the acts of the
people of madina are a major proof, and imam Malik deemed the ijmaa of the
people of madina to be proof, which is why the malaki scholars would pray with
open hands by relying on the action of the people of madina, and rejected the
hadeeth about folding the arms on account of the situation, when one hadeeth
supercedes another hadeeth. That is why they gave greater value to the hadeeth
from the people of madina. Abul qasim narrated from the risala of imam Malik
that the companions of imam Malik adhered to this, and imam Malik took
narration muwatta regarding qabzul yadein aqeedah that contradicted his madhab
such as narrations opposing qanoot in fajr prayes, whilst this is allowed in
the madhab of imam Malik.
Fatwas about praying with open
arms are not exclusively those of imam Malik, imam abu bakr ibn abi shaybah
narrates in al musannaf that ibn zubayr would pray with his arms open. Also
shaykh abdul haqq dehlavi wrote in sharh shafaa sadaath that he asked the the
Maliki ulema from hejaaz for proof for praying with open hand, they were unable
to bring forth proof, even though evidence is clear, the act of the people of
madina is a greater evidence for proving the actions of the actions of the
sahaba and tabieen.
Shaykh dehlavi’s acknowledgement
that the people of madina and Malikis prayed with open hands since they had no
other evidence to refute this position means that nasibi propaganda that shi’a
Salat is with basis and bidah is completely baseless!
.
Umar and imam shaafi had no
obajection to the Salat being red with open hands
We read in meezan al kubra…vol.
1…page 15…the chapter on the virtues of Salat:
It is better to drop your arms by
your sides during Salat, and imam gave a detailed fatwa on this matter in his
book ‘ilm’, if one who stands for prayers and has done no sinful act then there
is no objection to him praying with his hands open.
We read in kashf al ghimma…vol.
1…page 87…part 2:
Umar used to kill knits whilst
offereing Salat, to the extent that knits were clearly visible on his hands,
maaz bin jabeel was a leader in this field.
We challenge the nasibi’s to
demonstrate how you can kill knits whilst praying with the arms folded. You
can’t even kill one, then how did umar kill so many? He must have done this
with his arms open. It is not possible to kill knits and pray with the hands
folded at the same time, umar’s act of killing knits whilst praying is clear
proof that he prayed with his hands open.
Imam of ahl-e-sunnah auzai said
you can pray either with you arms open or folded.
As evidence we shall cite the
following esteemed sunni works:
Hidayah…vol. 1…page 102…part 21
Nayl al awtar…vol. 2…page 208…bab
ul Salat
Au jaza al masAlik sharh muwatta
imam Malik…vol. 3…page 298
Umada tul qari sharh sahih
bukhari…vol. 3…page 15…bab Salat
Al kifaya sharh hidayah…vol.
1…page 25
Meezan al kubra…vol. 1…page 150
Rehmat al aima…page 37
We read in al kifaya sharh
hidayah:
The sunnah is to pray with the
arms folded , imam auzai said one has free choice in Salat, he can fold his
arms or keep them open.
Imam shokani records in nail
al-awtar…vol. 3…page 298:
ونقل
ابن سيد الناس عن الأوزاعي التخيير بين الوضع والإرسال.
“ibn sayed al-naas narrated from
awzai that it is optional to fold or unfold”.
This fatwa proves that folding
the arms is not obligatory, neither is keeping them open an act of bidah.
.
A salafi scholar’s admission that
praying with unfolded hands is valid
Ahmad al-duwaish who is a salafi
scholar of saudi arabia records in his book fatawa al-lajna al-daema…vol.
6…page 366:
فإذا
صلى شخص وهو مرسل يديه فصلاته صحيحة؛ لأن وضع اليمنى علي اليسرى ليس من أركان
الصلاة ولا من شروطها ولا من واجباتها
‘if some one prayed with unfolded
hands, his prayer is valid, because putting the right hand on the left is
neither part of prayer’s pillars nor is a condition of prayer, nor its wajib.’
.
Sunni fatwa that lesser people
should pray with their arms open
Imam of ahl-e-sunnah abdul wahab
sherani records in meezan al-kubra…vol. 1…page 150…bab ul Salat:
“the act of folding the hands in
Salat is a special distinction for big people like the saints and scholars,
lesser people shoud adhere to the Maliki position and pray with their arms
open.”
Abdul wahab sherani in his
another book kabriyat al-ahmer…vol. 1…page 57 records:
“the acts of placing one hands
over the chest in Salat is reserved for the complete people, who have no
obstruction to Allah(s.w.t) when folding the arms. It is better for less
complete people to open their hands, since via closing the hands one’s
attention span towards Allah(s.w.t) diverts.”
.
Sunni fatwa to recite Salat with
open hands and close them if you get tired
“ibn qasim recorded imam Malik’s
reading with open hands in Salat, and the vast bulk of Maliki ulema have
embraced this fatwa, and they deem closing the arms to be makruh, ibn hajaab
said that folding of the arms should be restricted to ease.”
Fatah al bari sharh sahih
bukhari…vol. 1…page 324
“auzai said that closing or
opening the hands is within one’s choice, the option of folding is to make life
easier, as lengthy recitals would often lead blood rushing to the finger tips
of the sahaba.”
Kifaya sharh hidayah…vol. 1…page
250
وكذلك
عند مالك في المشهور يرسلهما وإن طال ذلك عليه وضع اليمنى على اليسرى للاستراحة
“the known from Malik that he
[Prophet(s.a.w.w)] used to unfold, if recitals are long then for the purposes
of ease he would fold.”
Umada tul qari sharh sahih
bukhari…vol. 3…page 5
.
Sunni rationale for folding hands
while offering prayers
Famous scholar of deobandis, shah
muhammad ismail wrote in his book tanveer ul ai’nain…page 30:
“the traditions of unfolding the
hands have been reported from pious followers like hasan basri, ibrahim, ibn e
musaiyab and ibn e seerain, as reported by ibne shaiba. If the traditions [of
folded hands] had reached these scholars, they did not deem it a sunnah, but
attributed it to a common practice. [they would have adopted it if they had
regarded it as holy Prophet’s practice]. Therefore they carried on with their
way of unfolded hands due to it being authentic and having evidence to that effect.
If these traditions had not reached them, we will assume they did not know
about the folding of the hands, they told people to open their hands when
praying, due to it being authentic, whereas the folding of hands is a custom
with no solid evidence.”
Perhaps shah ismail did not
regard the Malikis as sunnis, because they still offer prayers with unfolded
hands. The shah offers no solid evidence, and has made assumptions in order to
defend his faith. Worthy of note is the fact that when the sunnis are not
involved in acts themselves, they term such novelties as bid’at.
.
Logical reasoning as to why the
salaf opened their arms during Salat
We relay on the comments of two
books:
Al rauza lundheeya…vol. 1…page
197… by siddique hasan khan
Tanveer an aynain…page 58…by shah
ismaeel shaheed
Both authors commenting on why
the sahaba and tabieen read with the arms open state:
“they prayed with the arms open
as they were acting on the initial orders, since the foolding of the arms was a
new order that required evidence, which was not proven which is why they had no
other choice but to pray with the arms open.”
.
Our challenge to our critics
We challenge those who speak and
write vociferously against to produce evidence from hadeeth wherein the
Prophet(s.a.w.w) gave an explicit order that the arms be folded during Salat?
We are confident that the nasibi will be unable to locate any such evidence fom
their books. Our next question is ‘why did the Prophet(s.a.w.w) maintain
silence with regards to this matter’. It begs the question as to why the sahaba
did not seek to clarify this matter either? When no order exists to fold the
hands, then these nasibi should know that opening the arms is a natural thing,
which does not require any evidence to prove it.
.
The main reason for folding
hands: to oppose the shi’a
يُسَنُّ
الْإِرْسَالُ فِي الْجِنَازَةِ وَتَكْبِيرَاتِ الْعِيدِ وَالْقَوْمَةِ فَيَكُونُ
الْقِيَامُ مُطْلَقًا .
وَعَنْ
قَوْلِ أَصْحَابِ الْفَضْلِيِّ أَبِي عَلِيٍّ النَّسَفِيِّ وَالْحَاكِمِ وَعَبْدِ
الرَّحْمَنِ : السُّنَّةُ فِي هَذِهِ الْمَوَاضِعِ الِاعْتِمَادُ مُخَالَفَةً
لِلرَّوَافِضِ ، فَإِنَّهُمْ يُرْسِلُونَ
The sunnah in funeral prayers and
eid is to unfold and stand, the companions of fadheli abu Ali al-nasafi and
al-hakim and abdulrahman said: ‘the sunnah in such cases is to oppose the
rawafidh [shi'a] as they pray with their arms open.’
Fatah al qadeer…vol. 1…page
250…dhikr Salat
“the opening of the arms in Salat
is in the madhab of the rafidi, we fold our arms and the reason is to oppose
the shi’a.”
Kifaya sharh hidayah…vol. 1…page
250…dhikr Salat
Imam Malik gave an order to read
Salat with open arms, and the sunni ulema here [i.e; the indian subcontinent]
so that praying with open hands in the cities means imitating the shi’a. The
hanafi ulema have rejected opening the arms in Salat, opening the arms is a
shi’a practice, and nothing else will remain, and the Prophet(s.a.w.w) said:
‘protect yourself from acusation.’
Tanveer al aynain…page 38
Need we say anymore? One major
proof for folding the hands is to oppose the rafidi. We should also point out
that the rawafid also recite surah fateha during their Salat, the followers of
mu’awiya in their opposition to the rafidi should abandon surah fateha and
replace with rap lyrics or some bhajhan.
.
When & why did the method of
prayers change ?
Every single person with a broad
and research oriented mind and also those who intend to seek and extract the
truths of history would want to know that prayer, that was supposed to be the
symbol of unity, how did the five or six methods of it prevail and when was the
muslim ummah struck by this fatal blow? As far as the recitation while
observing qayyam, ruku [bowing], sajood [prostration], and tashahud etc is
concerned, some of them are the same in both the shi’a and the sunni prayers,
and the differences that exist in some of them, are very minute, therefore if
our honourable scholars display a bit of tolerance on its basis the unity in
the ummah can be strengthened.
The reAlity about the first part
of our question is that this change in prayers did not happen suddenly, infact
this was a gradual process that took place over the years, to the point that we
have the testimony of the sahabi Malik bin anas in sahih al bukhari…vol. 1…book
10…hadees no. 507:
Anas said: “i do not find
[now-a-days] things as they were [practiced] at the time of the
Prophet(s.a.w.w).” Somebody said: “the prayer [is as it was].” Anas said: “have
you not done in the prayer what you have done ?”
Narrated az-zuhri that he visited
anas bin Malik at damascus and found him weeping and asked him the reason for
it. He replied: “i do not know anything which i used to know during the lifetime
of Allah’s apostle except this prayer which is being lost[not offered as it
should be].”
Of relevance is the fact that we
read in sahih bukhari…virtues of the prayer hall…vol. 1…book 12…hadees no. 751:
Narrated imran bin husain:
I offered the prayer with
Ali(a.s) in basra and he made us remember the prayer which we used to pray with
Allah’s apostle. Ali(a.s) said takbir on each rising and bowing.
If one ponders over this
tradition from bukhari, then no further explanation of the fact is required
that the novelties in the method of prayers had already started in that era and
that is what made imran bin hasayn say that Ali(a.s) led the prayers just like
holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) used to lead. And the reply to the second issue that why
the changes took place, is quite simple that after holy Prophet(s.a.w.w), had
the ummah stuck to one single nucleus, that is the ahl-e-bait(a.s), these
differences would have not taken place, but when the nucleus was shattered then
the birth of novelties and differences was something natural.
.
The folding of the arms was
copied from the people of rome
This has been mentioned in the
following esteemed works:
Al-awaail…page 209…by allama
askari…chapter on islami namaz
Tanveer an aynain…page 58
Al rauza lundheeya…vol. 1…page
87…by siddique hasan khan
For example in tanveer an
aynain…page 58 we read:
Ibn sireen was asked a man why he
placed his right hand over the left hand in Salat, he said: “this was practice
of the romans.”
.
Contradicting fatawas amongst the
sunni ulema on folding the arms
Umdah tul qari sharh sahih
bukhari…vol. 3…page 16…bab Salat
Al rauza lundheeya…vol. 1…page
97…by siddique hasan khan
Nayl al awtar…vol. 2…page 204…bab
ul Salat
Meezan al kubra…vol. 1…page 150
Fatah ul bari sharh sahih
bukhari…vol. 2…page 224
For example in fatah ul bari
sharh sahih bukhari…vol. 2…page 224 we read:
The ulema have said that there is
wisdom behind the sunni method of Salat, since the act of folding the hands is
the act of a pathetic beggar, and positioning hands in this way prohibits bad
acts and this is a purer method.
Long recitals amongst the
muslims, meant people stood for lengthy periods. And blood would rush down to
the finger nails, that’s why via wisdom of the state the order was given to
fold the arms.
.
Conclusion
The shi’a perspective is very
clear and straight forward that holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) used to offer prayers
with straight and hanging hands, and the fact that the holy progeny of the
Prophet(s.a.w.w) practiced the same manner of prayers further strengthens it.
The second evidence for the shi’a
view being valid is the uncertain and unreliable attitude of the sunni
scholars, who even say that the worshipper is free to adopt any of the methods.
The third verification of the
shi’a perspective is that the madina born imam of sunnis, Malik bin anas is of
the view that the prayers should be offered with unfolded hands which is still
practiced by his followers, and on the basis of the same reAlities a sunni
researcher, dr. Hameed ullah [phd] has written:
In my view the difference between
the shi’a and the sunni methods of prayers has no importance. The followers of
Maliki faith, who are sunnis, offer prayers with unfolded hands like the
shi’as. This means that holy Prophet(s.a.w.w) sometimes offered prayers this
way, and sometimes the other way around.
Khutbaat-e-bahawalpur…by dr.
Hameed ullah (phd)…page 34…idara tehqeeqat e islamic research centre[islamabad]
The comments of maulana shibli
no’mani also carry relevance:
Prayers can be offered with
either unfolded hands, or folded hands, they can even be placed on the chest or
above the navel, ameen can be either be said loudly or with a low voice.
Therefore except a few acts, no specific method needs to be followed, that is
why the numerous imams adopted different methods.
Ilm ul-kalaam aur ikhlaas…page
311…published by nafees academy karachi
We hope that the sunni ulema
develop some courage and let the people know about this fact so that nasibi
propaganda against the shi’a can come to an end. Those who have been to libya
will see that the muslims there are predominantly Malikis and they offer
prayers with unfolded hands, besides this there are followers of imam Malik in
many other countries too, including the arab ones, and they all offer prayers
with unfolded hands, even behind a single imam some worshippers offer prayers
with unfolded hands while some fold their hands and this is not considered as a
difference.