Sunni Aalim Exposed Umar ibn Khattab

...

The Deceitful "Sunni" Belief of Misyar ! -Video

Sheikh  Abdul-Aziz bin Abdullah bin Baz (commonly known as "Bin Baz") has been described as the "figurehead of institutional Wahhabism", was one of the most prominent proponents of the Salafi ideology, and was the vice-president of the Islamic University of Madinah. In fact, in the 1990's, he was the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia - the single most influential Salafi religious authority, appointed by the country's tyrannical "King". The country's Grand Mufti is also granted presidency of the Permanent Committee of Islamic Studies and Verdicts - whose members are drawn from the Council of Senior Scholars (Saudi Arabia's highest body of religious clerics). In a question and answer session, Bin Baz has been recorded here controversially revealing his Fatwa (verdict) permitting the innovated...

જનાબે ફાતેમા (સ.અ.)ની ઈસ્મતની અલ્લાહ દ્વારા ઝમાનત લેવામાં આવી છે, કહેવાતા ખલીફાઓ દ્વારા પડકાર.

જનાબે ફાતેમા (સ.અ.)ની ઈસ્મતની અલ્લાહ દ્વારા ઝમાનત લેવામાં આવી છે, કહેવાતા ખલીફાઓ દ્વારા પડકાર. ખિલાફતને ગસબ કરી જનારાઓનાં સૌથી મોટા અને ન બક્ષી શકાય તેવા ગુનાહોમાંથી એક ગુનોહ એ છે કે તેઓએ રસુલે ખુદા (સ.અ.વ.)ના દુખ્તર જનાબે ફાતેમા ઝહરા (સ.અ.)ની ઈસ્મત ઉપર આરોપ મુકયો છે. તેઓએ આપ (સ.અ.)ની ફદકની મિલ્કત ઉપરનો અધિકાર ન તો ભેટ તરીકે અને ન તો વારસા તરીકે આપ્યો. આપ (સ.અ.)નો દરજ્જો અને આપનો રસુલુલ્લાહ (સ.અ.વ.) સાથેના સંબંધની કોઈ પરવા ન કરી. તેથી પણ વધારે અલ્લાહની નઝરમાં આપ (સ.અ.)ની ફઝીલત અને કુરઆને એલાન કરેલ આપ (સ.અ.)ની મન્ઝેલતનો પણ વિચાર ન કર્યો. આમ કરવાથી કહેવાતા ખલીફાઓએ દુનિયા અને આખેરતમાં ફકત પોતાની બરબાદી હાસીલ કરવામાં સફળતા મેળવી છે. કહેવાતા ખલીફાઓના બારામાં અમીરુલ મોઅમેનીન અલી ઈબ્ને અબી તાલિબ (અ.સ.) એ ...

બધા મુસલમાનો તબર્રા કરે છે, ન ફકત શીઆઓ

બધા મુસલમાનો તબર્રા કરે છે, ન ફકત શીઆઓ પ્રસ્તાવના: તબર્રાની બાબતે મુસલમાનોમાં બે મોટા મુખ્ય સમુહો છે. એક સમુહ તબર્રાની જડમુળમાંથી રદ કરે છે અને તેને વખોડે છે. બીજો સમુહ તબર્રાની દીનના ભાગ તરીકે અમલ કરે છે અને બીજી ઈબાદતો જેમકે નમાઝો, રોઝા, હજ, વિગેરેની જેમ તબર્રા ઉપર અમલ કરવામાં પોતાનો સમય અને મહેનત નાખી તેના ઉપર અમલ કરવામાં કોશિશ કરે છે. પહેલો સમુહ, યોગાનુયોગ જે બહુમતીમાં છે, માને છે કે તબર્રાની ઈસ્લામ સાથે કંઈ લેવા દેવા નથી અને અગર તે ઈસ્લામનો ભાગ હોત તો મુસલમાનો, ખાસ કરીને સહાબીઓ અને તાબેઈન (સહાબીઓની બીજી પેઢી) એ તેના ઉપર પહેલેથી અમલ કર્યો હોત. અમે અહીં એક વાતર્લિાપ વર્ણવીએ છીએ જે આ સમુહની તબર્રા બાબતે બધી ખોટી માન્યતાને રદ કરે છે. તબર્રા માત્ર લઅનતનું નામ નથી, અલબત્ત્ા લઅનત તેનો એક ભાગ છે. વધુ...

Why the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) allowed Umar and Abu Bakr and Wives near him ?

Courtesy : http://www.seratonline.com/27142/why-the-holy-prophet-s-a-w-a-allowed-the-shaikhain-and-wives-near-him/ The Muslim majority go all out to defend the companions – particularly the Shaikhain (Abu Bakr and Umar) and the wives from taints of treachery, hypocrisy and deceit. Their primary argument in defense of the Shaikhain and wives is the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) consent in admitting them in his gatherings and his house. Had the Shaikhain and wives been unworthy and treacherous, why did the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) allow them to get close to him and the Muslims? Reply There are multiple aspects to this rather basic defense of the Shaikhain and wives. Mere companionship is hardly any reason to respect someone and appoint him as a ‘caliph’ or to follow a wife in battle against...

Infallibility of Hazrat Fatima (s.a.) guaranteed by Allah the Almighty, challenged by the Abu Bakr and Umar

Among the biggest and possibly the most unforgivable blunders of the usurpers of Caliphate was to cast aspersions on the infallibility (ismat) of Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.), the daughter of our Great Prophet (s.a.w.a.). They managed to do this by summarily rejecting her right to the property of Fadak, first as a gift and next even as inheritance. No consideration was given to her status and her relationship with the Noble Prophet (s.a.w.a.). Worst, no thought was given to her position in the eyes of Allah the Almighty and as espoused by the Majestic Quran. In doing this, the pseudo-caliphs only succeeded in bringing about their own destruction in this world and the Hereafter. In a confrontation with the pseudo-caliphs, Ameerul Momineen Ali Ibn Abi Talib (a.s.) goes on to show...

Abu Bakr’s and Umar's claim of consensus (ijmaa) on Fadak is pointless

The topic of Fadak and the bigger debate on the inheritance of divine Prophets (a.s.) is among the key and earliest distinguishing points between the Shias and others. The majority claims that Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) – the Holy Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) daughter – had no right to Fadak because Allah’s Prophets (a.s.) do not leave behind inheritance. To bolster their claim, they resort to the age-old formula of consensus (ijmaa) – meaning that the so-called Muslim majority and companions supported Abu Bakr in his claim that divine Prophets (a.s.) do not leave behind inheritance. This supposed consensus against Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) proves that Abu Bakr was right and Hazrat Fatima (s.a.) had no claim over Fadak. Reply There are many aspects to this debate and there are several...

Real reason why Abu Bakr refused to hand over Fadak to Fatima Zahra (s.a.)

Muslims in general claim that Fadak was never a matter for debate and discussion since in their view – Prophets neither inherit nor leave behind any inheritance, all their property and wealth is for the common Muslims. Although this is the widely touted position of the supporters of companions and wives, we know that this was not the real reason for denying Fadak to Aal Muhammad (a.s.). The real reason was rather simple when you research history. Abu Bakr willing to hand over Fadak For all the lengthy discussions and debates on Fadak, it comes as no surprise that the matter of Fadak was resolved in Hazrat Fatima Zahra’s (s.a.) favour initially. When Abu Bakr demanded that Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) advance witnesses in support of her claim over it, she (s.a.) produced Umme Ayman...

Fadak belonged to Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) based on Islamic laws

The Shaikhain refused to grant Fadak to Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) on one pretext or the other. They rejected her own witness as also the witnesses of her infallible husband Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) and even Umm Ayman – whose honesty was beyond reproach having been assured Paradise by the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.). In the absence of witnesses or rather in the absence of ‘credible’ witnesses, Hazrat Fatima Zahra’s (s.a.) claim on Fadak was rejected. Over here we do not wish to delve on the infallible personalities (a.s.) and their status near Allah and the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) and how the rulers made a blunder by ignoring this reality which was evident even to a Muslim child. We only wish to draw the attention of the reader to the irregularities in the stand of the Shaikhain vis-à-vis...

A most absurd defense of the Umar in the attack on Fatima Zahra’s (s.a.) house

Certain Sunni scholars have dismissed reports of an attack on Hazrat Fatima Zahra’s (s.a.) house by offering vague and absurd reasons in defense of the companions. Their primary objective is to portray the companions as paragons of virtue and decency (Adalat-e-Sahabah) at all cost, even in the face of irrefutable reports to the contrary. We analyze over here the weak defense mounted by scholars like Ibn Abil Hadid and Shah Abdul Aziz Dehalwi to clear the names of the companions behind the attack on Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.). Ibn Abil Hadid asserts: As for the recording (by the Shias) of the attack on the house of Fatima (s.a.) and gathering wood to burn it down, then it’s on the authority of a sole narrator (Khabarun Wahidun) and cannot be deemed reliable for the companions,...

Necessity of Tabarra against Ali ( A.S) whoever they may be !

One hears the strangest of objections when it comes to Tabarra against the enemies of Ameerul Momineen (a.s.). One group claims that we should avoid Tabarra because the enemies of Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) are revered by some sections of the Muslim community. These Muslims are likely to get offended by Tabarra. So for the sake of these Muslims and the broader demands of ‘Muslim Unity’, we must avoid Tabarra against enemies of Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) and on the contrary, we should respect them because they are revered by their followers! Reply  To the proponents of this suggestion, we have only question: Are these Muslims willing to forgive and forget when it comes to their own opponents and enemies? Why do they hunt down their own enemies, imprison them and even kill them? Are...

After denying Fadak why were Abu Bakr and Umar buried in the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) house?

There are two facts that the Muslim majority accepts without much debate: The Shaikhain refused to grant Fadak to Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) by dismissing the testimonies of her infallible husband Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) and even Umm Ayman on the excuse that Prophets (s.a.w.a.) do not leave any inheritance. Abu Bakr and Umar are buried next to the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) by virtue of the property inherited by their daughters Ayesha and Hafsa. Reply The obvious contradiction between points a. and b. is plain even to a lay Muslim – If Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) cannot inherit property from her father (s.a.w.a.) then how can the Shaikhain inherit their burial place in the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) house? An eye-opening debate on the subject nullifies the burial of the Shaikhain and...

Saqifa - Urdu Book

Saqifa by SWHRZ's on Scrib...

Janabe Umme Kulthum ka Aqd Umar se Nahi Hua tha ---Urdu Book

Sihmi Masmum Fi Jawab Nikahi Ummi kulsoom URDU by LoverofAli on Scribd Musannif ni Matam e Hussain ko Ahadees (Sunat e Rasool), Sonat e Ahlibait our Sonat e Sahaba se sabit kia hai. Our Mulve Israr our dosri tamam munafikeen ki mun hamisha hamihsa kileye band kar deye hai...