We shall cite the following authentic Sunni sources as proof:
- Fatah ul Bari, Volume 9 page 174
- Talkhees al Habeer, Volume 3 page 159
- Sharh Zarqani (commentary of Muwatta) Volume 3 page 53
- Aujza al Masalik, Sharh Muwatta, Volume 9 page 403
- Nail al-Autar Volume 6 page 153
- Musanaf Abdul Razaq, Volume 7 page 499
Imam Ibn Hajr Asqalani in ‘Talkhees al Habeer fi Takhreej al Hadeeth
al Rafa al Kabeer’ Volume 3 page 159 (printed Cairo) quotes Ibn Hazam as
follows:
“After the death of Holy Prophet (s), a group of Salaf deemed it Halal. Amongst the Sahaba they were Asma bint Abi Bakr, Jabir bin Abdullah, Ibn Masood, Ibn Abbas, Mu’awiya,
Amr bin Huraith, Abu Saeed, Salama and Mu’abad bin Umaya bin Khalaf. He
said that Jabir reported from the companions that (it was valid) during
the reign of the Prophet, Abu Bakr and some part of Umar’s reign. He
said that it is reported from Umar that he forbade it only if there were
not two just witnesses. Some of Tab’een deemed (it halal) such as
Tawous, Atta, Saeed bin Jubair and the majority of the jurists of
Makka.”
The above individuals, all highly esteemed in the Sunni faith, deemed Mut’ah to be halaal after the death of Rasulullah(s).
If it was haram and is Zina, then why did the site in law of
Rasulullah (s) practise it? And then we have the beloved Imam of Enemies
of the Ahl al-Bayt (as), fifth Imam of Ahlul Sunnah, Mu’awiya, believed
it, practised it and paid this woman regular stipends? We read in Fatah
ul Bari Volume 9 pages 174:
Abdulrazaq recorded from Safwan bin Yala bin Umaya that he
said: ‘Yala told me that Muawiya perfrormed mutah with a woman in
Taaif’. The chain is Sahih, but in Abi al-Zubair’s narration from Jabir
as Abdulrazaq recorded was from past and text is: “When Muawiya arrived
in Taaif, he performed mutah with a slave woman whose name was Mu’ana
and she belonged to Bani al-Hadhrami” Then Jabir said: ‘Mu’ana lived
till Mu’awiya’s riegn, he used to send her stipends every year’.
Fatah ul Bari Volume 9 pages 17
Fatah ul Bari Volume 9 pages 17
This has been similarly recorded in Musanaf Abdul Razaq, Volume 7 page 499.
Before parting, we deem it apt to cite the following account of the
one of the most close Nasibi companion of Muawiya namely Samra bin
Jundab:
“The father of Sulayman, perhaps he is Samra bin Jundab, he
narrated from Manda from Mubsher bin Ismail from Huraiz bin Uthman from
Sulayman bin Samir from his father that he said: ‘We used to perform
Mut’ah during the time of Allah’s Messenger.”
Al-Isaba, Volume 3 page 185 Biography No. 3494
Al-Isaba, Volume 3 page 185 Biography No. 3494
Comment:
If Mut’ah is adultery in the eyes of Nawasib like that of ‘Sipah e
Sahaba’ (kr-hcy.com) then will they issue an edict against Mu’awiya for
committing adultery? And why are they not ashamed of the adultery
committed by their caliph and beloved sahabi? Nawasib such as Ansar.org
are very proud to call Mu’awiya a ‘Hadi’ (guide) according to a
(supposed) hadeeth, if the ‘Hadi’ of Nawasib is an adulterer then what
can we expect from his followers!
Categories:
English
0 comments:
Post a Comment
براہ مہربانی شائستہ زبان کا استعمال کریں۔ تقریبا ہر موضوع پر 'گمنام' لوگوں کے بہت سے تبصرے موجود ہیں. اس لئےتاریخ 20-3-2015 سے ہم گمنام کمینٹنگ کو بند کر رہے ہیں. اس تاریخ سے درست ای میل اکاؤنٹس کے ضریعے آپ تبصرہ کر سکتے ہیں.جن تبصروں میں لنکس ہونگے انہیں فوراً ہٹا دیا جائے گا. اس لئے آپنے تبصروں میں لنکس شامل نہ کریں.
Please use Polite Language.
As there are many comments from 'anonymous' people on every subject. So from 20-3-2015 we are disabling 'Anonymous Commenting' option. From this date only users with valid E-mail accounts can comment. All the comments with LINKs will be removed. So please don't add links to your comments.